Runge Approximation Theorem in One Complex Variable (Theorem # 3712)
Theorem
Let $\Omega \subset \mathbb{C}$ be a Runge domain, in the sense that every compact subset of $\Omega$ has polynomial hull compactly contained in $\Omega$. Let $f: \Omega \to \mathbb{C}$ be holomorphic, let $K \Subset \Omega$ be compact, and let $\varepsilon > 0$. Then there exists a polynomial map $p: \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}$ such that
\begin{align*}
\int_K |f(z)-p(z)|^2\,d\mathcal L^2(z) < \varepsilon.
\end{align*}
Moreover, if $K$ is replaced by a compact set $K_0$ with $K \subset K_0^\circ \Subset \Omega$ and $\widehat K_{0,\mathrm{poly}} \Subset \Omega$, then the same construction gives uniform approximation on $K$.
Discussion
This theorem says that holomorphic functions on a Runge domain can be approximated by polynomials on compact subsets, including in L2 form and sometimes uniformly. It is useful because it turns local holomorphic data into global polynomial approximants.
Proof
[proofplan]
We first enlarge $K$ to a compact set $K_0$ whose polynomial hull remains inside $\Omega$, and we cut off $f$ by a smooth function equal to $1$ near $K_0$. The resulting $\bar\partial$-error is supported away from $K$, and polynomial convexity supplies a smooth subharmonic weight that is negative near $K$ and positive on that support. Hörmander's weighted $L^2$ estimate for $\bar\partial$ on $\mathbb C$ then produces entire functions converging to $f$ in $L^2(K)$. Finally, the Taylor polynomials of one of these entire functions give polynomial approximants.
[/proofplan]
[step:Enlarge $K$ and localize $f$ by a compactly supported cutoff]
Here $d\mathcal L^2$ denotes two-dimensional Lebesgue measure on $\mathbb C\cong\mathbb R^2$, and $\widehat K_{0,\mathrm{poly}}$ denotes the polynomial hull of $K_0$. Since $\Omega$ is Runge, choose a compact set $K_0 \subset \Omega$ such that
\begin{align*}
K \subset K_0^\circ \subset K_0 \Subset \Omega,
\qquad
\widehat K_{0,\mathrm{poly}} \Subset \Omega.
\end{align*}
Define the polynomial hull of $K_0$ by
\begin{align*}
\widehat K_{0,\mathrm{poly}}
:=
\left\{z \in \mathbb C : |q(z)| \le \sup_{w \in K_0}|q(w)| \text{ for every } q \in \mathbb C[z]\right\}.
\end{align*}
Choose an [open set](/page/Open%20Set) $V \subset \mathbb C$ with
\begin{align*}
\widehat K_{0,\mathrm{poly}} \Subset V \Subset \Omega.
\end{align*}
By smooth cutoff construction, choose
\begin{align*}
\chi: \mathbb C \to [0,1]
\end{align*}
with $\chi \in C_c^\infty(\Omega)$ and $\chi = 1$ on $V$.
Define the smooth compactly supported function
\begin{align*}
g: \mathbb C &\to \mathbb C \\
z &\mapsto
\begin{cases}
\chi(z)f(z), & z \in \Omega,\\
0, & z \in \mathbb C \setminus \operatorname{supp}\chi,
\end{cases}
\end{align*}
where the definition is smooth because $\operatorname{supp}\chi \Subset \Omega$. Since $f$ is holomorphic on $\Omega$, the compactly supported $(0,1)$-form
\begin{align*}
\alpha = a\,d\bar z
\end{align*}
defined by
\begin{align*}
a: \mathbb C &\to \mathbb C \\
z &\mapsto \frac{\partial g}{\partial \bar z}(z)
\end{align*}
satisfies
\begin{align*}
a(z)= f(z)\frac{\partial \chi}{\partial \bar z}(z)
\end{align*}
for $z \in \Omega$. Because $\chi=1$ on $V$ and $\widehat K_{0,\mathrm{poly}} \Subset V$, we have
\begin{align*}
\operatorname{supp} a \cap \widehat K_{0,\mathrm{poly}} = \varnothing.
\end{align*}
In particular, $\operatorname{supp} a$ is a compact subset of $\Omega \setminus \widehat K_{0,\mathrm{poly}}$.
[guided]
The purpose of the cutoff is to turn the local [holomorphic function](/page/Holomorphic%20Function) $f$ into a globally defined smooth function on $\mathbb C$, at the cost of introducing a controlled $\bar\partial$-error. The measure $d\mathcal L^2$ is two-dimensional Lebesgue measure on $\mathbb C\cong\mathbb R^2$, and the notation $\widehat K_{0,\mathrm{poly}}$ means the polynomial hull of $K_0$. Since $\Omega$ is Runge, we may enlarge $K$ to a compact set $K_0$ with
\begin{align*}
K \subset K_0^\circ \subset K_0 \Subset \Omega,
\qquad
\widehat K_{0,\mathrm{poly}} \Subset \Omega.
\end{align*}
Define the polynomial hull of $K_0$ by
\begin{align*}
\widehat K_{0,\mathrm{poly}}
:=
\left\{z \in \mathbb C : |q(z)| \le \sup_{w \in K_0}|q(w)| \text{ for every } q \in \mathbb C[z]\right\}.
\end{align*}
We then choose an [open set](/page/Open%20Set) $V \subset \mathbb C$ satisfying
\begin{align*}
\widehat K_{0,\mathrm{poly}} \Subset V \Subset \Omega,
\end{align*}
and a smooth cutoff
\begin{align*}
\chi: \mathbb C \to [0,1]
\end{align*}
with $\chi \in C_c^\infty(\Omega)$ and $\chi=1$ on $V$.
Define
\begin{align*}
g: \mathbb C &\to \mathbb C \\
z &\mapsto
\begin{cases}
\chi(z)f(z), & z \in \Omega,\\
0, & z \in \mathbb C \setminus \operatorname{supp}\chi.
\end{cases}
\end{align*}
This is a globally smooth compactly supported function because $\operatorname{supp}\chi$ is compactly contained in $\Omega$. Its $\bar\partial$-derivative is the compactly supported $(0,1)$-form $\alpha=a\,d\bar z$, where
\begin{align*}
a: \mathbb C &\to \mathbb C \\
z &\mapsto \frac{\partial g}{\partial \bar z}(z).
\end{align*}
On $\Omega$, the product rule gives
\begin{align*}
a(z)=\frac{\partial}{\partial \bar z}(\chi f)(z)
= f(z)\frac{\partial \chi}{\partial \bar z}(z)
+\chi(z)\frac{\partial f}{\partial \bar z}(z).
\end{align*}
Since $f$ is holomorphic, $\partial f/\partial \bar z=0$, hence
\begin{align*}
a(z)=f(z)\frac{\partial\chi}{\partial \bar z}(z).
\end{align*}
Because $\chi=1$ on $V$, its $\bar\partial$-derivative vanishes on $V$. Since $\widehat K_{0,\mathrm{poly}} \Subset V$, this gives
\begin{align*}
\operatorname{supp}a \cap \widehat K_{0,\mathrm{poly}}=\varnothing.
\end{align*}
This separation is the geometric input needed for the weighted estimate: the error lies away from the entire polynomial hull of the set on which approximation is required.
[/guided]
[/step]
[step:Construct a subharmonic weight separating $K$ from the $\bar\partial$-error]
Let
\begin{align*}
L := \operatorname{supp} a.
\end{align*}
If $L=\varnothing$, define
\begin{align*}
\psi: \mathbb C &\to \mathbb R \\
z &\mapsto -1,
\end{align*}
and set $\eta:=1$. Then $\psi$ is smooth and subharmonic, $\psi\le -\eta$ on $K$, and $\psi\ge \eta$ on $L$ holds vacuously. Hence assume for the rest of this step that $L\ne\varnothing$.
Since $L$ is compact and $L \cap \widehat K_{0,\mathrm{poly}}=\varnothing$, polynomial convexity gives, for each $\zeta \in L$, a polynomial
\begin{align*}
h_\zeta: \mathbb C \to \mathbb C
\end{align*}
such that
\begin{align*}
T_\zeta := |h_\zeta(\zeta)| > S_\zeta := \sup_{z \in K_0}|h_\zeta(z)|.
\end{align*}
Choose an integer $m_\zeta\ge1$ such that
\begin{align*}
T_\zeta^{m_\zeta}>4S_\zeta^{m_\zeta},
\end{align*}
where this is automatic with $m_\zeta=1$ if $S_\zeta=0$, and otherwise follows from $(T_\zeta/S_\zeta)^{m_\zeta}\to\infty$. Choose a constant $\lambda_\zeta>0$ satisfying
\begin{align*}
\frac{2}{T_\zeta^{m_\zeta}}<\lambda_\zeta\le \frac{1}{2S_\zeta^{m_\zeta}},
\end{align*}
with the upper bound interpreted as $+\infty$ when $S_\zeta=0$. This interval is non-empty precisely because $T_\zeta^{m_\zeta}>4S_\zeta^{m_\zeta}$. Define the rescaled polynomial
\begin{align*}
q_\zeta: \mathbb C &\to \mathbb C \\
z &\mapsto \lambda_\zeta h_\zeta(z)^{m_\zeta}.
\end{align*}
Then
\begin{align*}
\sup_{z \in K_0}|q_\zeta(z)| \le \lambda_\zeta S_\zeta^{m_\zeta} \le \frac{1}{2},
\qquad
|q_\zeta(\zeta)| = \lambda_\zeta T_\zeta^{m_\zeta} > 2.
\end{align*}
By continuity and compactness of $L$, choose $\zeta_1,\dots,\zeta_N \in L$ such that, for every $z \in L$, at least one index $j \in \{1,\dots,N\}$ satisfies
\begin{align*}
|q_{\zeta_j}(z)| > 1.
\end{align*}
Choose an integer $M \ge 1$ such that
\begin{align*}
N4^{-M}<\frac14,
\end{align*}
and define polynomial maps
\begin{align*}
r_j: \mathbb C &\to \mathbb C \\
z &\mapsto q_{\zeta_j}(z)^M
\end{align*}
for $j\in\{1,\dots,N\}$. Then
\begin{align*}
\sum_{j=1}^N |r_j(z)|^2 < \frac14 \quad \text{for all } z \in K_0,
\end{align*}
while for every $z\in L$ at least one $j$ satisfies $|r_j(z)|>1$. Define
\begin{align*}
\Psi: \mathbb C &\to \mathbb R \\
z &\mapsto \log\left(\sum_{j=1}^N |r_j(z)|^2 + \frac{1}{4}\right).
\end{align*}
Then $\Psi$ is smooth and subharmonic. Moreover,
\begin{align*}
\Psi(z) < \log\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)
\end{align*}
on $K_0$, while
\begin{align*}
\Psi(z) > \log\left(\frac{5}{4}\right)
\end{align*}
on $L$. After replacing $\Psi$ by an affine rescaling
\begin{align*}
\psi: \mathbb C &\to \mathbb R \\
z &\mapsto A\Psi(z)-B
\end{align*}
with constants $A>0$ and $B \in \mathbb R$ chosen large enough, there exists $\eta>0$ such that
\begin{align*}
\psi(z) \le -\eta \quad \text{for all } z \in K,
\qquad
\psi(z) \ge \eta \quad \text{for all } z \in L.
\end{align*}
The affine rescaling preserves smoothness and subharmonicity.
[guided]
We need a weight that rewards smallness on $K$ while penalising the support of the $\bar\partial$-error. Set
\begin{align*}
L := \operatorname{supp}a.
\end{align*}
If $L=\varnothing$, there is no error support to separate. In that case define
\begin{align*}
\psi: \mathbb C &\to \mathbb R \\
z &\mapsto -1,
\end{align*}
and set $\eta:=1$. Then $\psi$ is smooth and subharmonic, $\psi\le -\eta$ on $K$, and the condition $\psi\ge\eta$ on $L$ is vacuous. We therefore assume from now on in this construction that $L\ne\varnothing$.
The set $L$ is compact, and from the previous step it is disjoint from $\widehat K_{0,\mathrm{poly}}$. Since each point of $L$ lies outside the polynomial hull of $K_0$, polynomial convexity first gives only strict separation: for every $\zeta \in L$, there is a polynomial map
\begin{align*}
h_\zeta: \mathbb C \to \mathbb C
\end{align*}
such that
\begin{align*}
T_\zeta:=|h_\zeta(\zeta)|>S_\zeta:=\sup_{z\in K_0}|h_\zeta(z)|.
\end{align*}
To get the stronger numerical constants needed later, we first amplify the strict inequality by taking powers. Choose $m_\zeta\ge1$ so that
\begin{align*}
T_\zeta^{m_\zeta}>4S_\zeta^{m_\zeta};
\end{align*}
if $S_\zeta=0$, this holds with $m_\zeta=1$, while if $S_\zeta>0$ it follows from $(T_\zeta/S_\zeta)^{m_\zeta}\to\infty$. Now choose $\lambda_\zeta>0$ with
\begin{align*}
\frac{2}{T_\zeta^{m_\zeta}}<\lambda_\zeta\le \frac{1}{2S_\zeta^{m_\zeta}},
\end{align*}
interpreting the upper bound as $+\infty$ when $S_\zeta=0$. The interval is non-empty because $T_\zeta^{m_\zeta}>4S_\zeta^{m_\zeta}$. Define
\begin{align*}
q_\zeta: \mathbb C &\to \mathbb C \\
z &\mapsto \lambda_\zeta h_\zeta(z)^{m_\zeta}.
\end{align*}
Then the upper bound on $\lambda_\zeta$ gives
\begin{align*}
\sup_{z \in K_0}|q_\zeta(z)| \le \frac{1}{2},
\end{align*}
and the lower bound gives
\begin{align*}
|q_\zeta(\zeta)| > 2.
\end{align*}
By continuity, the inequality $|q_\zeta|>1$ holds on an open neighbourhood of $\zeta$. Compactness of $L$ gives finitely many points $\zeta_1,\dots,\zeta_N \in L$ such that for every $z \in L$ there is some $j$ with
\begin{align*}
|q_{\zeta_j}(z)|>1.
\end{align*}
The finite number $N$ may be large, so the estimates must be normalised before summing. Choose an integer $M\ge1$ such that
\begin{align*}
N4^{-M}<\frac14,
\end{align*}
and define polynomial maps
\begin{align*}
r_j: \mathbb C &\to \mathbb C \\
z &\mapsto q_{\zeta_j}(z)^M
\end{align*}
for $j\in\{1,\dots,N\}$. On $K_0$, each $|q_{\zeta_j}|<1/2$, hence
\begin{align*}
\sum_{j=1}^N |r_j(z)|^2
=
\sum_{j=1}^N |q_{\zeta_j}(z)|^{2M}
<
N4^{-M}
<
\frac14.
\end{align*}
On $L$, at least one $|q_{\zeta_j}(z)|$ is greater than $1$, so the corresponding $|r_j(z)|$ is also greater than $1$.
Now define
\begin{align*}
\Psi: \mathbb C &\to \mathbb R \\
z &\mapsto \log\left(\sum_{j=1}^N |r_j(z)|^2+\frac{1}{4}\right).
\end{align*}
The function $\Psi$ is smooth because the quantity inside the logarithm is everywhere at least $1/4$. It is subharmonic because logarithms of sums of squared moduli of holomorphic functions, with a positive constant added, are subharmonic.
On $K_0$ we have
\begin{align*}
\sum_{j=1}^N |r_j(z)|^2+\frac14 < \frac12,
\end{align*}
and hence
\begin{align*}
\Psi(z)<\log\left(\frac12\right)
\end{align*}
for $z \in K_0$. On the other hand, if $z \in L$, then one of the polynomials $r_j$ has modulus greater than $1$, so
\begin{align*}
\sum_{j=1}^N |r_j(z)|^2+\frac14 > \frac54,
\end{align*}
and therefore
\begin{align*}
\Psi(z)>\log\left(\frac54\right).
\end{align*}
Finally choose constants $A>0$ and $B \in \mathbb R$ so that
\begin{align*}
\psi(z):=A\Psi(z)-B
\end{align*}
satisfies, for some $\eta>0$,
\begin{align*}
\psi(z)\le -\eta \quad \text{on } K,
\qquad
\psi(z)\ge \eta \quad \text{on } L.
\end{align*}
Affine rescaling by a positive factor preserves subharmonicity, so $\psi$ is still a smooth subharmonic function.
[/guided]
[/step]
[step:Solve the $\bar\partial$-equation with weights that force smallness on $K$]
For each integer $m \ge 1$, define the smooth subharmonic weight
\begin{align*}
\varphi_m: \mathbb C &\to \mathbb R \\
z &\mapsto m\psi(z)+|z|^2.
\end{align*}
We use the following complete-plane form of Hörmander's weighted $L^2$ estimate for $\bar\partial$ on $\mathbb C$ (citing a result not yet in the wiki: Hörmander $L^2$ estimate for the $\bar\partial$-equation). This is the one-dimensional complete Kähler case with the standard Euclidean metric on $\mathbb C$ and the auxiliary exhaustion factor $(1+|z|^2)^{-2}$ included in the estimate. If $\varphi:\mathbb C\to\mathbb R$ is smooth and subharmonic, and if $a:\mathbb C\to\mathbb C$ is measurable with
\begin{align*}
\int_{\mathbb C}|a(z)|^2e^{-\varphi(z)}\,d\mathcal L^2(z)<\infty,
\end{align*}
then there exists $u\in L^2_{\mathrm{loc}}(\mathbb C)$ with $\partial u/\partial\bar z=a$ in the sense of distributions and
\begin{align*}
\int_{\mathbb C}\frac{|u(z)|^2 e^{-\varphi(z)}}{(1+|z|^2)^2}\,d\mathcal L^2(z)
\le
\int_{\mathbb C}|a(z)|^2 e^{-\varphi(z)}\,d\mathcal L^2(z).
\end{align*}
For $\varphi=\varphi_m$, the smooth subharmonicity has just been verified. Since $a$ is continuous with compact support $L$, the weighted integral is finite. Therefore there exists
\begin{align*}
u_m: \mathbb C \to \mathbb C
\end{align*}
with $u_m \in L^2_{\mathrm{loc}}(\mathbb C)$ and
\begin{align*}
\frac{\partial u_m}{\partial \bar z}=a
\end{align*}
in the sense of distributions, such that
\begin{align*}
\int_{\mathbb C}\frac{|u_m(z)|^2 e^{-\varphi_m(z)}}{(1+|z|^2)^2}\,d\mathcal L^2(z)
\le
\int_{\mathbb C}|a(z)|^2 e^{-\varphi_m(z)}\,d\mathcal L^2(z).
\end{align*}
Let
\begin{align*}
R_K := \sup_{z \in K}|z|,
\qquad
M_L :=
\begin{cases}
\sup_{z \in L} e^{-|z|^2}|a(z)|^2, & L\ne\varnothing,\\
0, & L=\varnothing.
\end{cases}
\end{align*}
Since $\psi \ge \eta$ on $L$, the right-hand side satisfies
\begin{align*}
\int_{\mathbb C}|a(z)|^2e^{-\varphi_m(z)}\,d\mathcal L^2(z)
=
\int_L |a(z)|^2e^{-m\psi(z)-|z|^2}\,d\mathcal L^2(z)
\le
M_L\,\mathcal L^2(L)e^{-m\eta}.
\end{align*}
Since $\psi \le -\eta$ on $K$, for $z \in K$ we have
\begin{align*}
\frac{e^{-\varphi_m(z)}}{(1+|z|^2)^2}
=
\frac{e^{-m\psi(z)-|z|^2}}{(1+|z|^2)^2}
\ge
\frac{e^{m\eta-R_K^2}}{(1+R_K^2)^2}.
\end{align*}
Therefore
\begin{align*}
\int_K |u_m(z)|^2\,d\mathcal L^2(z)
\le
(1+R_K^2)^2 e^{R_K^2} M_L\mathcal L^2(L)e^{-2m\eta}.
\end{align*}
Thus
\begin{align*}
\lim_{m\to\infty}\int_K |u_m(z)|^2\,d\mathcal L^2(z)=0.
\end{align*}
[guided]
For each integer $m\ge1$, define
\begin{align*}
\varphi_m: \mathbb C &\to \mathbb R \\
z &\mapsto m\psi(z)+|z|^2.
\end{align*}
The function $\varphi_m$ is smooth and subharmonic because $\psi$ is smooth and subharmonic, $|z|^2$ is smooth and subharmonic, and positive linear combinations preserve subharmonicity.
We now apply the complete-plane form of Hörmander's weighted $L^2$ estimate for $\bar\partial$ on $\mathbb C$ (citing a result not yet in the wiki: Hörmander $L^2$ estimate for the $\bar\partial$-equation). This is the one-dimensional complete Kähler case for the standard Euclidean metric on $\mathbb C$; the auxiliary exhaustion in that formulation is responsible for the factor $(1+|z|^2)^{-2}$ on the left-hand side. The version used says that a smooth subharmonic weight $\varphi:\mathbb C\to\mathbb R$ and a measurable coefficient $a:\mathbb C\to\mathbb C$ with
\begin{align*}
\int_{\mathbb C}|a(z)|^2e^{-\varphi(z)}\,d\mathcal L^2(z)<\infty
\end{align*}
produce a distributional solution $u$ of $\partial u/\partial\bar z=a$ satisfying the displayed weighted estimate below. Here $\varphi_m$ is smooth and subharmonic, and $a$ is continuous with compact support $L$, so the weighted integral is finite for this fixed $m$. The theorem gives a function
\begin{align*}
u_m: \mathbb C \to \mathbb C
\end{align*}
with $u_m \in L^2_{\mathrm{loc}}(\mathbb C)$ and
\begin{align*}
\frac{\partial u_m}{\partial \bar z}=a
\end{align*}
in the distributional sense, satisfying
\begin{align*}
\int_{\mathbb C}\frac{|u_m(z)|^2 e^{-\varphi_m(z)}}{(1+|z|^2)^2}\,d\mathcal L^2(z)
\le
\int_{\mathbb C}|a(z)|^2 e^{-\varphi_m(z)}\,d\mathcal L^2(z).
\end{align*}
The point of the sign choice is now visible. On the support $L$ of $a$, the weight has $\psi \ge \eta$, so the right-hand side is exponentially small. Define
\begin{align*}
M_L :=
\begin{cases}
\sup_{z \in L} e^{-|z|^2}|a(z)|^2, & L\ne\varnothing,\\
0, & L=\varnothing.
\end{cases}
\end{align*}
Since $L$ is compact and $a$ is continuous, $M_L<\infty$. Because $a=0$ outside $L$,
\begin{align*}
\int_{\mathbb C}|a(z)|^2e^{-\varphi_m(z)}\,d\mathcal L^2(z)
=
\int_L |a(z)|^2e^{-m\psi(z)-|z|^2}\,d\mathcal L^2(z)
\le
M_L\,\mathcal L^2(L)e^{-m\eta}.
\end{align*}
On $K$, the weight has the opposite sign: $\psi \le -\eta$. Define
\begin{align*}
R_K := \sup_{z \in K}|z|.
\end{align*}
Then for $z \in K$,
\begin{align*}
\frac{e^{-\varphi_m(z)}}{(1+|z|^2)^2}
=
\frac{e^{-m\psi(z)-|z|^2}}{(1+|z|^2)^2}
\ge
\frac{e^{m\eta-R_K^2}}{(1+R_K^2)^2}.
\end{align*}
Combining this lower bound on $K$ with Hörmander's estimate gives
\begin{align*}
\frac{e^{m\eta-R_K^2}}{(1+R_K^2)^2}
\int_K |u_m(z)|^2\,d\mathcal L^2(z)
\le
M_L\,\mathcal L^2(L)e^{-m\eta}.
\end{align*}
Hence
\begin{align*}
\int_K |u_m(z)|^2\,d\mathcal L^2(z)
\le
(1+R_K^2)^2 e^{R_K^2}M_L\mathcal L^2(L)e^{-2m\eta}.
\end{align*}
The right-hand side tends to $0$ as $m\to\infty$, so $u_m \to 0$ in $L^2(K)$.
[/guided]
[/step]
[step:Subtract the solution to obtain entire approximants]
Define
\begin{align*}
F_m: \mathbb C &\to \mathbb C \\
z &\mapsto g(z)-u_m(z).
\end{align*}
In the sense of distributions,
\begin{align*}
\frac{\partial F_m}{\partial \bar z}
=
\frac{\partial g}{\partial \bar z}
-
\frac{\partial u_m}{\partial \bar z}
=
a-a
=
0.
\end{align*}
By the Weyl lemma for the $\bar\partial$-operator (citing a result not yet in the wiki: Weyl lemma for $\bar\partial$), $F_m$ agrees almost everywhere with an entire function on $\mathbb C$; we replace $F_m$ by that entire representative.
Since $\chi=1$ on a neighbourhood of $K$, we have $g=f$ on $K$. Therefore
\begin{align*}
\int_K |F_m(z)-f(z)|^2\,d\mathcal L^2(z)
=
\int_K |u_m(z)|^2\,d\mathcal L^2(z)
\to 0
\end{align*}
as $m\to\infty$.
[guided]
We now cancel the $\bar\partial$-error. Define
\begin{align*}
F_m: \mathbb C &\to \mathbb C \\
z &\mapsto g(z)-u_m(z).
\end{align*}
Both terms are locally square-integrable, so the distributional $\bar\partial$ derivative is defined. Using the equation $\partial u_m/\partial\bar z=a$ and the definition $a=\partial g/\partial\bar z$, we get
\begin{align*}
\frac{\partial F_m}{\partial \bar z}
=
\frac{\partial g}{\partial \bar z}
-
\frac{\partial u_m}{\partial \bar z}
=
a-a
=
0
\end{align*}
as distributions.
A function with vanishing distributional $\bar\partial$ derivative is holomorphic after modification on a null set, by the Weyl lemma for the $\bar\partial$-operator (citing a result not yet in the wiki: Weyl lemma for $\bar\partial$). Thus we regard $F_m$ as an entire function on $\mathbb C$.
On $K$, the cutoff has introduced no error because $\chi=1$ on a neighbourhood of $K_0$ and $K \subset K_0$. Therefore $g=f$ on $K$, and
\begin{align*}
F_m-f = g-u_m-f = -u_m
\end{align*}
on $K$. Hence
\begin{align*}
\int_K |F_m(z)-f(z)|^2\,d\mathcal L^2(z)
=
\int_K |u_m(z)|^2\,d\mathcal L^2(z).
\end{align*}
The previous step proves that the right-hand side tends to $0$, so the entire functions $F_m$ approximate $f$ in $L^2(K)$.
[/guided]
[/step]
[step:Approximate one entire approximant by a polynomial and upgrade on a larger compact set]
Choose $m$ large enough that
\begin{align*}
\int_K |F_m(z)-f(z)|^2\,d\mathcal L^2(z) < \frac{\varepsilon}{4}.
\end{align*}
Let
\begin{align*}
R := 1+\sup_{z \in K}|z|.
\end{align*}
Since $F_m$ is entire, its Taylor series at $0$ converges uniformly on the compact closed disk $\overline{B}(0,R)$. Hence there exists a Taylor polynomial
\begin{align*}
p: \mathbb C &\to \mathbb C
\end{align*}
such that
\begin{align*}
\sup_{z \in K}|F_m(z)-p(z)|
<
\left(\frac{\varepsilon}{4\max\{1,\mathcal L^2(K)\}}\right)^{1/2}.
\end{align*}
Therefore
\begin{align*}
\int_K |F_m(z)-p(z)|^2\,d\mathcal L^2(z)
<
\frac{\varepsilon}{4}.
\end{align*}
Using the inequality $|A+B|^2 \le 2|A|^2+2|B|^2$ with
\begin{align*}
A=f-F_m,
\qquad
B=F_m-p,
\end{align*}
we obtain
\begin{align*}
\int_K |f(z)-p(z)|^2\,d\mathcal L^2(z)
&\le
2\int_K |f(z)-F_m(z)|^2\,d\mathcal L^2(z)
+
2\int_K |F_m(z)-p(z)|^2\,d\mathcal L^2(z)\\
&<
\varepsilon.
\end{align*}
This proves the $L^2(K)$ polynomial approximation.
For the uniform assertion, replace the original compact set by a compact set $K_1$ with
\begin{align*}
K \subset K_1^\circ \subset K_1 \Subset \Omega,
\qquad
\widehat K_{1,\mathrm{poly}}\Subset\Omega.
\end{align*}
The preceding construction applied to $K_1$ gives entire functions $F_m$ such that
\begin{align*}
\int_{K_1}|F_m(z)-f(z)|^2\,d\mathcal L^2(z)\to0.
\end{align*}
Choose $r>0$ such that $\overline{B}(z,r)\subset K_1^\circ$ for every $z\in K$. This is possible because $K$ is compact and $K\subset K_1^\circ$. Since $F_m-f$ is holomorphic on $K_1^\circ$, the submean-value inequality for the non-negative subharmonic function $|F_m-f|^2$ gives, for every $z\in K$,
\begin{align*}
|F_m(z)-f(z)|^2
\le
\frac{1}{\pi r^2}\int_{B(z,r)}|F_m(w)-f(w)|^2\,d\mathcal L^2(w)
\le
\frac{1}{\pi r^2}\int_{K_1}|F_m(w)-f(w)|^2\,d\mathcal L^2(w).
\end{align*}
Taking the supremum over $z\in K$ shows $F_m\to f$ uniformly on $K$. Choose $m$ with
\begin{align*}
\sup_{z\in K}|F_m(z)-f(z)|<\frac{\varepsilon}{2}.
\end{align*}
Since $F_m$ is entire, its Taylor polynomials converge uniformly on a closed disk containing $K$, so choose a Taylor polynomial $p$ with
\begin{align*}
\sup_{z\in K}|F_m(z)-p(z)|<\frac{\varepsilon}{2}.
\end{align*}
Then
\begin{align*}
\sup_{z\in K}|f(z)-p(z)|
\le
\sup_{z\in K}|f(z)-F_m(z)|+
\sup_{z\in K}|F_m(z)-p(z)|
<\varepsilon.
\end{align*}
This proves the stated uniform approximation after enlarging the compact set used in the construction.
[guided]
First prove the requested $L^2$ approximation. Choose $m$ so large that
\begin{align*}
\int_K |F_m(z)-f(z)|^2\,d\mathcal L^2(z) < \frac{\varepsilon}{4}.
\end{align*}
Let
\begin{align*}
R := 1+\sup_{z \in K}|z|.
\end{align*}
The compact set $K$ is contained in the closed disk $\overline{B}(0,R)$. Since $F_m$ is entire, its Taylor series at $0$ converges uniformly on $\overline{B}(0,R)$. Therefore some Taylor polynomial
\begin{align*}
p: \mathbb C &\to \mathbb C
\end{align*}
satisfies
\begin{align*}
\sup_{z \in K}|F_m(z)-p(z)|
<
\left(\frac{\varepsilon}{4\max\{1,\mathcal L^2(K)\}}\right)^{1/2}.
\end{align*}
It follows that
\begin{align*}
\int_K |F_m(z)-p(z)|^2\,d\mathcal L^2(z)
\le
\mathcal L^2(K)\sup_{z\in K}|F_m(z)-p(z)|^2
<
\frac{\varepsilon}{4}.
\end{align*}
Now decompose the error as
\begin{align*}
f-p=(f-F_m)+(F_m-p).
\end{align*}
The elementary inequality $|A+B|^2\le2|A|^2+2|B|^2$ gives
\begin{align*}
\int_K |f(z)-p(z)|^2\,d\mathcal L^2(z)
&\le
2\int_K |f(z)-F_m(z)|^2\,d\mathcal L^2(z)
+
2\int_K |F_m(z)-p(z)|^2\,d\mathcal L^2(z)\\
&<\varepsilon.
\end{align*}
This proves the $L^2(K)$ assertion.
Now prove the uniform assertion rather than merely citing the same argument. Choose a larger compact set $K_1$ with
\begin{align*}
K \subset K_1^\circ \subset K_1 \Subset \Omega,
\qquad
\widehat K_{1,\mathrm{poly}}\Subset\Omega.
\end{align*}
Applying the already proved weighted construction with $K_1$ in place of $K$ gives entire functions $F_m$ satisfying
\begin{align*}
\int_{K_1}|F_m(z)-f(z)|^2\,d\mathcal L^2(z)\to0.
\end{align*}
Why does this imply [uniform convergence](/page/Uniform%20Convergence) on the smaller set $K$? The difference $F_m-f$ is holomorphic on $K_1^\circ$, so $|F_m-f|^2$ is subharmonic there. Since $K$ is compactly contained in $K_1^\circ$, choose $r>0$ such that every closed disk $\overline{B}(z,r)$ with $z\in K$ lies in $K_1^\circ$. The submean-value inequality gives
\begin{align*}
|F_m(z)-f(z)|^2
\le
\frac{1}{\pi r^2}\int_{B(z,r)}|F_m(w)-f(w)|^2\,d\mathcal L^2(w)
\le
\frac{1}{\pi r^2}\int_{K_1}|F_m(w)-f(w)|^2\,d\mathcal L^2(w)
\end{align*}
for every $z\in K$. Taking the supremum over $K$ proves $F_m\to f$ uniformly on $K$.
Choose $m$ so large that
\begin{align*}
\sup_{z\in K}|F_m(z)-f(z)|<\frac{\varepsilon}{2}.
\end{align*}
Since $F_m$ is entire, choose a Taylor polynomial $p$ approximating $F_m$ uniformly on a closed disk containing $K$ with
\begin{align*}
\sup_{z\in K}|F_m(z)-p(z)|<\frac{\varepsilon}{2}.
\end{align*}
Then the triangle inequality gives
\begin{align*}
\sup_{z\in K}|f(z)-p(z)|
\le
\sup_{z\in K}|f(z)-F_m(z)|+
\sup_{z\in K}|F_m(z)-p(z)|
<\varepsilon.
\end{align*}
Thus the uniform approximation follows after enlarging the compact set used in the $L^2$ construction.
[/guided]
[/step]
Explore Further
Mixing Hierarchy
analysis
Model Hilbert Space Solvability Principle
analysis
Local Weight Criterion for Positivity of Hermitian Line Bundles
analysis
Tail Invariance of Series Convergence
analysis
Zeroth Čech Cohomology is Global Sections
analysis
Hörmander Estimate for Strictly Plurisubharmonic Weights
analysis
Category of Smooth Manifolds
analysis
Cohomology from Acyclic Resolutions
analysis