Green's Representation For Poisson's Equation (Theorem # 42)
Theorem
Let $U \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ be a bounded $C^1$ domain and let $u \in C^2(U) \cap C(\overline{U})$ solve
\begin{align*}
-\Delta u = f \ \text{in } U, \qquad u = g \ \text{on } \partial U,
\end{align*}
with $f \in C(\overline{U})$ and $g \in C(\partial U)$. Assume that for each fixed $x \in U$ there exists a [function](/page/Function) $G(x,\cdot)$ (the Dirichlet Green’s function of $U$) such that:
\begin{align*}
&\text{(i) } G(x,\cdot) \in L^1_{\mathrm{loc}}(U), \quad G(x,y)=0 \ \text{for } y \in \partial U \ \text{(trace)};\\
&\text{(ii) } -\Delta_y G(x,\cdot) = \delta_x \ \text{in } \mathcal{D}'(U);\\
&\text{(iii) } \partial_\nu G(x,\cdot) := \nabla_y G(x,\cdot)\!\cdot\!\nu(\cdot) \ \text{exists as a boundary trace and is } \mathcal{H}^{n-1}\text{-integrable.}
\end{align*}
Then for every $x \in U$,
\begin{align*}
u(x) = - \int_{\partial U} g(y)\,\partial_\nu G(x,y)\, d\mathcal{H}^{n-1}(y) \;+\; \int_{U} f(y)\, G(x,y)\, d\mathcal{L}^{n}(y).
\end{align*}
Analysis
Partial Differential Equations
Discussion
Why this matters (and what $G$ really is). The identity expresses interior values of the solution $u$ entirely in terms of the data $(f,g)$ by means of a kernel $G$ attached to the domain $U$. From a PDE viewpoint, $G$ is the integral kernel of the inverse of the Dirichlet Laplacian: it yields uniqueness at once, enables [boundary](/page/Boundary)–integral methods, and serves as a starting point for regularity and potential–theoretic estimates. In harmonic analysis, $G$ links Poisson-type representations with properties of harmonic and subharmonic [functions](/page/Function) inside $U$.
Assumptions and existence. In the theorem we **assume** there exists a function $G(x,\cdot)$ for each $x \in U$ with $-\Delta_y G(x,\cdot)=\delta_x$ in $\mathcal{D}'(U)$ and $G(x,\cdot)=0$ on $\partial U$ (and with $\partial_\nu G(x,\cdot)$ [integrable](/page/Integral) on $\partial U$). Later we will show that under standard geometric hypotheses on $U$ (e.g., bounded $C^1$ domains, and more generally via Perron's method) such a Green function indeed exists.
Connection with the fundamental solution. We have already established that the fundamental solution $\Phi$ satisfies, in the [distributional](/page/Distribution) sense,
\begin{align*}
-\Delta \Phi = \delta_0, \qquad \Phi \in L_{\mathrm{loc}}^1(\mathbb{R}^n), \quad \Phi(x) =
\begin{cases}
-\dfrac{1}{2\pi}\log|x|, & n=2,\\[2pt]
\dfrac{\Gamma(1+\tfrac{n}{2})}{n(n-2)\pi^{n/2}}\,|x|^{2-n}, & n \ge 3.
\end{cases}
\end{align*}
Hence, for fixed $x \in U$, the existence of a Dirichlet Green function $G(x,\cdot)$ is **equivalent** to solvability of the following Dirichlet problem in the variable $y$:
\begin{align*}
\Delta_y H_x(y) = 0 \ \text{in } U, \qquad H_x(y) = \Phi(x-y) \ \text{on } \partial U,
\end{align*}
because then
\begin{align*}
G(x,y) := \Phi(x-y) - H_x(y)
\end{align*}
satisfies $-\Delta_y G(x,\cdot)=\delta_x$ in $U$ and $G(x,\cdot)=0$ on $\partial U$. Conversely, given such a $G$, defining $H_x(y):=\Phi(x-y)-G(x,y)$ provides the harmonic extension of the boundary datum $\Phi(x-\cdot)$. Thus, establishing existence of $G$ amounts to solving a family of Dirichlet problems with boundary data taken from the fundamental solution.
Takeaway. Once $G$ exists, Green's third identity combined with the distributional relation $-\Delta_y G(x,\cdot)=\delta_x$ produces the representation formula in the theorem. This cleanly separates (i) analytic structure (distribution identity and [integration by parts](/theorems/210)) from (ii) geometric/functional-analytic input (existence of the harmonic correction $H_x$ ensuring the right boundary behavior).
Proof
[proofplan]
We fix $x \in U$ and excise a small ball $B(x, \varepsilon) \subset U$. On the punctured domain $U_\varepsilon := U \setminus \overline{B}(x, \varepsilon)$, the Green's function $G(x, \cdot)$ is smooth, so [Green's second identity](/theorems/27) applies to the pair $(u, G(x, \cdot))$. The PDE $-\Delta u = f$, the boundary condition $G(x, \cdot) = 0$ on $\partial U$, and the asymptotic behaviour of $G$ near its singularity reduce the identity to three contributions: a volume integral of $fG$, a boundary integral of $g \, \partial_\nu G$ on $\partial U$, and surface integrals over $\partial B(x, \varepsilon)$. Passing $\varepsilon \to 0$, the surface integrals converge to $u(x)$ and the volume integral converges to $\int_U fG \, d\mathcal{L}^n$, yielding the representation formula.
[/proofplan]
[step:Record the distributional identity for $G$ and the PDE for $u$]
Fix $x \in U$. By hypothesis (ii), $-\Delta_y G(x, \cdot) = \delta_x$ in $\mathcal{D}'(U)$, meaning that for every $\varphi \in C_c^\infty(U)$,
\begin{align*}
\varphi(x) = \delta_x(\varphi) = (-\Delta_y G(x, \cdot))(\varphi) = \int_U G(x, y)\, \Delta \varphi(y) \, d\mathcal{L}^n(y).
\end{align*}
The solution $u \in C^2(U) \cap C(\overline{U})$ satisfies $-\Delta u = f$ in $U$ and $u = g$ on $\partial U$.
[/step]
[step:Excise the singularity and apply Green's second identity on the punctured domain]
Since $G(x, \cdot)$ has a singularity at $y = x$ (its distributional Laplacian is $-\delta_x$, not an $L^1$ function), we cannot apply [Green's second identity](/theorems/27) directly on $U$. Instead, choose $\varepsilon > 0$ small enough that $\overline{B}(x, \varepsilon) \subset U$, and define the punctured domain
\begin{align*}
U_\varepsilon := U \setminus \overline{B}(x, \varepsilon).
\end{align*}
On $U_\varepsilon$, the function $G(x, \cdot)$ is $C^2$ (the singularity at $y = x$ has been removed) and satisfies $\Delta_y G(x, y) = 0$ for $y \in U_\varepsilon$, since $-\Delta_y G(x, \cdot) = \delta_x$ is supported at $\{x\}$. Both $u$ and $G(x, \cdot)$ are $C^2$ on $U_\varepsilon$, and $U_\varepsilon$ is a bounded domain with piecewise $C^1$ boundary $\partial U_\varepsilon = \partial U \cup \partial B(x, \varepsilon)$. Therefore [Green's second identity](/theorems/27) applies on $U_\varepsilon$:
\begin{align*}
\int_{U_\varepsilon} \bigl( u(y)\, \Delta_y G(x, y) - G(x, y)\, \Delta u(y) \bigr) \, d\mathcal{L}^n(y) = \int_{\partial U_\varepsilon} \bigl( u(y)\, \partial_{\nu_\varepsilon} G(x, y) - G(x, y)\, \partial_{\nu_\varepsilon} u(y) \bigr) \, d\mathcal{H}^{n-1}(y),
\end{align*}
where $\nu_\varepsilon$ denotes the outward unit normal to $U_\varepsilon$. On $\partial U$, the outward normal $\nu_\varepsilon$ coincides with $\nu$. On $\partial B(x, \varepsilon)$, the outward normal to $U_\varepsilon$ points *inward* toward $x$, so $\nu_\varepsilon(y) = -\frac{y - x}{|y - x|} = -\frac{y - x}{\varepsilon}$.
[guided]
Why can we not apply Green's second identity directly on $U$? The identity requires both functions to be $C^2$ on the domain. The function $u \in C^2(U)$ satisfies this, but $G(x, \cdot)$ does not: its distributional Laplacian $-\Delta_y G(x, \cdot) = \delta_x$ is a Dirac mass at $x$, meaning $G(x, \cdot)$ has a non-removable singularity at $y = x$. (In $\mathbb{R}^n$ with $n \geq 2$, the fundamental solution $\Phi(x - y)$ has a singularity of order $|x - y|^{2-n}$ for $n \geq 3$ or $\log|x - y|$ for $n = 2$, and $G$ inherits this singular behaviour.)
The standard technique is **excision**: we remove a small ball $\overline{B}(x, \varepsilon) \subset U$ around the singularity. On the punctured domain $U_\varepsilon := U \setminus \overline{B}(x, \varepsilon)$, the function $G(x, \cdot)$ is $C^2$ because the only singularity has been excised. Moreover, $\Delta_y G(x, y) = 0$ for $y \in U_\varepsilon$, since the distributional equation $-\Delta_y G = \delta_x$ tells us that $G(x, \cdot)$ is harmonic away from $x$.
The boundary of $U_\varepsilon$ has two components: the original $\partial U$ and the sphere $\partial B(x, \varepsilon)$. The outward normal to $U_\varepsilon$ on $\partial B(x, \varepsilon)$ points toward $x$ (inward with respect to the ball, outward with respect to the punctured domain), giving $\nu_\varepsilon(y) = -\frac{y - x}{\varepsilon}$.
With both functions $C^2$ on $U_\varepsilon$ and $\partial U_\varepsilon$ piecewise $C^1$, [Green's second identity](/theorems/27) yields:
\begin{align*}
\int_{U_\varepsilon} \bigl( u(y)\, \Delta_y G(x, y) - G(x, y)\, \Delta u(y) \bigr) \, d\mathcal{L}^n(y) = \int_{\partial U_\varepsilon} \bigl( u(y)\, \partial_{\nu_\varepsilon} G(x, y) - G(x, y)\, \partial_{\nu_\varepsilon} u(y) \bigr) \, d\mathcal{H}^{n-1}(y).
\end{align*}
[/guided]
[/step]
[step:Evaluate the volume integral on $U_\varepsilon$ using $\Delta_y G = 0$ and $-\Delta u = f$]
Since $\Delta_y G(x, y) = 0$ for all $y \in U_\varepsilon$ (the singularity at $x$ lies outside $U_\varepsilon$), the first term in the volume integral vanishes. Using $-\Delta u = f$:
\begin{align*}
\int_{U_\varepsilon} \bigl( u(y)\, \Delta_y G(x, y) - G(x, y)\, \Delta u(y) \bigr) \, d\mathcal{L}^n(y) = \int_{U_\varepsilon} G(x, y)\, f(y) \, d\mathcal{L}^n(y).
\end{align*}
[/step]
[step:Evaluate the boundary integrals on $\partial U$ using $G(x, \cdot) = 0$ and $u = g$]
The boundary $\partial U_\varepsilon = \partial U \cup \partial B(x, \varepsilon)$ splits the right-hand side into integrals over $\partial U$ and $\partial B(x, \varepsilon)$. On $\partial U$, the outward normal $\nu_\varepsilon = \nu$. By hypothesis (i), $G(x, y) = 0$ for $y \in \partial U$, so the $G \, \partial_\nu u$ term vanishes there. Since $u = g$ on $\partial U$, the $\partial U$ contribution is
\begin{align*}
\int_{\partial U} g(y)\, \partial_\nu G(x, y) \, d\mathcal{H}^{n-1}(y).
\end{align*}
The boundary integrals involving $\partial_\nu G(x, \cdot)$ on $\partial U$ are finite by hypothesis (iii), and $u, \partial_\nu u$ are [continuous](/page/Continuity) on $\overline{U}$ hence bounded on the compact set $\partial U$.
[/step]
[step:Evaluate the surface integrals over $\partial B(x, \varepsilon)$ and pass $\varepsilon \to 0$]
On $\partial B(x, \varepsilon)$, the outward normal to $U_\varepsilon$ is $\nu_\varepsilon(y) = -\frac{y - x}{\varepsilon}$. The sphere $\partial B(x, \varepsilon)$ has $\mathcal{H}^{n-1}$-measure $n \alpha_n \varepsilon^{n-1}$, where $\alpha_n = \mathcal{L}^n(B(0,1))$ is the volume of the unit ball in $\mathbb{R}^n$. The surface integrals over $\partial B(x, \varepsilon)$ are
\begin{align*}
I_\varepsilon &:= \int_{\partial B(x, \varepsilon)} u(y)\, \partial_{\nu_\varepsilon} G(x, y) \, d\mathcal{H}^{n-1}(y) - \int_{\partial B(x, \varepsilon)} G(x, y)\, \partial_{\nu_\varepsilon} u(y) \, d\mathcal{H}^{n-1}(y).
\end{align*}
**Second integral.** Since $u \in C^2(U)$, the function $\partial_{\nu_\varepsilon} u$ is bounded on $\overline{B}(x, \varepsilon)$ by some constant $M > 0$ independent of $\varepsilon$ (for $\varepsilon$ small enough). The Green's function satisfies $G(x, y) = O(|y - x|^{2-n})$ as $y \to x$ for $n \geq 3$ (respectively $G(x, y) = O(\log|y - x|)$ for $n = 2$). On $\partial B(x, \varepsilon)$, $|y - x| = \varepsilon$, so
\begin{align*}
\left| \int_{\partial B(x, \varepsilon)} G(x, y)\, \partial_{\nu_\varepsilon} u(y) \, d\mathcal{H}^{n-1}(y) \right| &\leq M \cdot \sup_{y \in \partial B(x, \varepsilon)} |G(x, y)| \cdot \mathcal{H}^{n-1}(\partial B(x, \varepsilon)) \\
&= O(\varepsilon^{2-n}) \cdot O(\varepsilon^{n-1}) = O(\varepsilon) \to 0 \quad \text{as } \varepsilon \to 0
\end{align*}
for $n \geq 3$. For $n = 2$, the bound becomes $O(|\log \varepsilon|) \cdot O(\varepsilon) \to 0$.
**First integral.** Write $G(x, y) = \Phi(x - y) - \phi^x(y)$, where $\Phi$ is the fundamental solution of $-\Delta$ and $\phi^x \in C^2(\overline{U})$ is the corrector (harmonic in $U$ with $\phi^x = \Phi(x - \cdot)$ on $\partial U$). Then $\partial_{\nu_\varepsilon} G = \partial_{\nu_\varepsilon} \Phi(x - \cdot) - \partial_{\nu_\varepsilon} \phi^x$. The corrector term satisfies $|\partial_{\nu_\varepsilon} \phi^x| \leq C$ on $\partial B(x, \varepsilon)$, so its integral is $O(\varepsilon^{n-1}) \to 0$. For the fundamental solution, with $\nu_\varepsilon(y) = -\frac{y-x}{\varepsilon}$:
\begin{align*}
\partial_{\nu_\varepsilon} \Phi(x - y) = \nabla_y \Phi(x - y) \cdot \nu_\varepsilon(y) = \frac{1}{n \alpha_n \varepsilon^{n-1}} \quad \text{for } y \in \partial B(x, \varepsilon),
\end{align*}
using the standard computation $\nabla_y \Phi(x - y) = \frac{1}{n \alpha_n} \frac{y - x}{|y - x|^n}$. Therefore
\begin{align*}
\int_{\partial B(x, \varepsilon)} u(y)\, \partial_{\nu_\varepsilon} \Phi(x - y) \, d\mathcal{H}^{n-1}(y) = \frac{1}{n \alpha_n \varepsilon^{n-1}} \int_{\partial B(x, \varepsilon)} u(y) \, d\mathcal{H}^{n-1}(y) = \frac{1}{\mathcal{H}^{n-1}(\partial B(x, \varepsilon))} \int_{\partial B(x, \varepsilon)} u(y) \, d\mathcal{H}^{n-1}(y).
\end{align*}
This is the spherical average of $u$ over $\partial B(x, \varepsilon)$. Since $u$ is continuous at $x$, this average converges to $u(x)$ as $\varepsilon \to 0$.
Combining, $I_\varepsilon \to u(x)$ as $\varepsilon \to 0$.
[guided]
This is the heart of the argument. The Green's function $G(x, \cdot)$ is singular at $y = x$, and we must understand precisely how the surface integrals over $\partial B(x, \varepsilon)$ behave as the excised ball shrinks.
The key structural fact is that $G(x, y) = \Phi(x - y) - \phi^x(y)$, where $\Phi$ is the fundamental solution of $-\Delta$ and $\phi^x$ is a smooth corrector (harmonic in $U$, chosen so that $G(x, \cdot) = 0$ on $\partial U$). The singular behaviour of $G$ near $x$ comes entirely from $\Phi$, and $\phi^x$ is smooth up to and including $x$.
For the second integral (the one involving $G \, \partial_{\nu_\varepsilon} u$): $\partial_{\nu_\varepsilon} u$ is bounded near $x$ since $u \in C^2$, and $G(x, y) = O(|y - x|^{2-n})$ for $n \geq 3$. The surface area of $\partial B(x, \varepsilon)$ is $n \alpha_n \varepsilon^{n-1}$. So the integral is bounded by $C \varepsilon^{2-n} \cdot \varepsilon^{n-1} = C\varepsilon \to 0$. The $n = 2$ case gives $O(|\log \varepsilon| \cdot \varepsilon) \to 0$.
For the first integral (the one involving $u \, \partial_{\nu_\varepsilon} G$): the corrector contributes $O(\varepsilon^{n-1}) \to 0$. The fundamental solution contributes a constant flux through $\partial B(x, \varepsilon)$. Explicitly, $\nabla_y \Phi(x - y) = \frac{1}{n \alpha_n} \frac{y - x}{|y - x|^n}$, and dotting with $\nu_\varepsilon = -\frac{y - x}{\varepsilon}$ gives $\partial_{\nu_\varepsilon} \Phi = \frac{1}{n \alpha_n \varepsilon^{n-1}}$. Integrating $u \cdot \frac{1}{n \alpha_n \varepsilon^{n-1}}$ over $\partial B(x, \varepsilon)$ (which has measure $n \alpha_n \varepsilon^{n-1}$) yields exactly the spherical average of $u$. By continuity of $u$ at $x$, this average converges to $u(x)$.
Thus $I_\varepsilon \to u(x) - 0 = u(x)$ as $\varepsilon \to 0$.
[/guided]
[/step]
[step:Combine all contributions and pass $\varepsilon \to 0$ to obtain the representation formula]
Assembling the identity on $U_\varepsilon$: the volume integral equals $\int_{U_\varepsilon} G(x, y) f(y) \, d\mathcal{L}^n(y)$, the $\partial U$ contribution is $\int_{\partial U} g(y) \, \partial_\nu G(x, y) \, d\mathcal{H}^{n-1}(y)$, and the $\partial B(x, \varepsilon)$ contribution is $I_\varepsilon$. Green's second identity gives
\begin{align*}
\int_{U_\varepsilon} G(x, y)\, f(y) \, d\mathcal{L}^n(y) = \int_{\partial U} g(y)\, \partial_\nu G(x, y) \, d\mathcal{H}^{n-1}(y) + I_\varepsilon.
\end{align*}
As $\varepsilon \to 0$: the volume integral $\int_{U_\varepsilon} G(x, y) f(y) \, d\mathcal{L}^n(y) \to \int_U G(x, y) f(y) \, d\mathcal{L}^n(y)$ by the dominated convergence theorem (since $G(x, \cdot) f \in L^1(U)$ by hypothesis (i) and continuity of $f$), and $I_\varepsilon \to u(x)$. The $\partial U$ integral is independent of $\varepsilon$. Therefore
\begin{align*}
\int_U G(x, y)\, f(y) \, d\mathcal{L}^n(y) = \int_{\partial U} g(y)\, \partial_\nu G(x, y) \, d\mathcal{H}^{n-1}(y) + u(x).
\end{align*}
Rearranging:
\begin{align*}
u(x) = -\int_{\partial U} g(y)\, \partial_\nu G(x, y) \, d\mathcal{H}^{n-1}(y) + \int_U f(y)\, G(x, y) \, d\mathcal{L}^n(y),
\end{align*}
which is the claimed representation formula.
[/step]
Prerequisites (0/4 completed)
Prerequisites Graph
Interactive dependency map showing how this theorem builds on foundational concepts
Loading dependency graph...
Theorem
Definition
Current
Requires
Theorems
- Fundamental Solution has Laplacian as the dirac delta distribution (name to be changed)
- Green's Identities (Measure Theoretic)
Definitions & Concepts