[proofplan]
The proof is a pointwise linear-algebra argument on the regular level hypersurface $\Sigma=H^{-1}(c)$. At a point $x\in\Sigma$, the tangent space is $\ker dH_x$, and the defining identity $\omega(X_H,\cdot)=dH$ shows that $X_H(x)$ annihilates $T_x\Sigma$ under $\omega_x$. The same identity and skew-symmetry show that $X_H(x)$ is tangent to $\Sigma$, while regularity and nondegeneracy show that it is nonzero. Since the regular level set theorem makes $\Sigma$ a smooth hypersurface in the symplectic manifold $(M^{2n},\omega)$, the hypotheses of [citetheorem:10060] apply; its rank-one conclusion then implies that this nonzero element spans the characteristic line.
[/proofplan]
custom_env
admin
[step:Identify the tangent space of the regular level hypersurface]Fix $x\in\Sigma$. Since $c$ is a regular value of $H$, the differential
\begin{align*}
dH_x:T_xM\to T_c\mathbb R\cong\mathbb R
\end{align*}
is nonzero. By the regular level set theorem, applied to the smooth map $H:M\to\mathbb R$ at the regular value $c$, $\Sigma$ is an embedded hypersurface of $M$ and
\begin{align*}
T_x\Sigma=\ker dH_x.
\end{align*}
Equivalently, for every vector $w\in T_xM$,
\begin{align*}
w\in T_x\Sigma \iff dH_x(w)=0.
\end{align*}[/step]
custom_env
admin
[guided]Fix a point $x\in\Sigma$. The first structural fact we need is the tangent space of the level set. Because $c$ is a regular value of the smooth map $H:M\to\mathbb R$, the differential
\begin{align*}
dH_x:T_xM\to T_c\mathbb R\cong\mathbb R
\end{align*}
is a nonzero linear functional. The regular level set theorem therefore applies to $H$ at the value $c$: it says that $\Sigma=H^{-1}(c)$ is an embedded hypersurface and that its tangent space at $x$ consists exactly of the tangent vectors killed by $dH_x$. Thus
\begin{align*}
T_x\Sigma=\ker dH_x.
\end{align*}
This identification is the bridge between the differential equation defining the Hamiltonian vector field and the geometry of the hypersurface. It means that proving a vector lies in $T_x\Sigma$ is the same as proving that $dH_x$ evaluates to zero on that vector.
The Hamiltonian vector field is defined by the identity $\omega(X_H,\cdot)=dH$. Evaluating this identity at $x$ and on the vector $X_H(x)\in T_xM$ gives
\begin{align*}
dH_x(X_H(x))=\omega_x(X_H(x),X_H(x)).
\end{align*}
Because $\omega_x$ is an alternating [bilinear form](/page/Bilinear%20Form), $\omega_x(X_H(x),X_H(x))=0$. Hence $dH_x(X_H(x))=0$, and the tangent-space identification gives $X_H(x)\in T_x\Sigma$.
Now let $w\in T_x\Sigma$. Since $T_x\Sigma=\ker dH_x$, we have $dH_x(w)=0$. Applying the same Hamiltonian identity to $w$ gives
\begin{align*}
\omega_x(X_H(x),w)=dH_x(w)=0.
\end{align*}
Since this holds for every $w\in T_x\Sigma$ and $X_H(x)\in T_x\Sigma$, the vector $X_H(x)$ lies in the characteristic kernel $\ker(\omega_x|_{T_x\Sigma})=\mathcal L_{\Sigma,x}$.
It remains to know that this vector is not zero. If $X_H(x)=0$, then for every $v\in T_xM$,
\begin{align*}
dH_x(v)=\omega_x(X_H(x),v)=\omega_x(0,v)=0.
\end{align*}
Thus $dH_x=0$, contradicting that $c$ is a regular value of $H$. Therefore $X_H(x)\ne 0$.
Finally, $\Sigma$ is a smooth hypersurface in the symplectic manifold $(M^{2n},\omega)$ by the regular level set theorem, so [citetheorem:10060] applies and says that $\ker(\omega_x|_{T_x\Sigma})$ is one-dimensional. A nonzero vector in a one-dimensional real [vector space](/page/Vector%20Space) spans it, so
\begin{align*}
\mathbb R X_H(x)=\ker\left(\omega_x|_{T_x\Sigma}\right)=\mathcal L_{\Sigma,x}.
\end{align*}[/guided]
custom_env
admin
[step:Show that the Hamiltonian vector field is tangent to the level hypersurface]
By the defining identity for the Hamiltonian vector field,
\begin{align*}
dH_x(v)=\omega_x(X_H(x),v)
\end{align*}
for every $v\in T_xM$. Taking $v=X_H(x)$ gives
\begin{align*}
dH_x(X_H(x))=\omega_x(X_H(x),X_H(x)).
\end{align*}
Since $\omega_x$ is alternating, $\omega_x(X_H(x),X_H(x))=0$. Hence
\begin{align*}
dH_x(X_H(x))=0.
\end{align*}
Using $T_x\Sigma=\ker dH_x$, we obtain
\begin{align*}
X_H(x)\in T_x\Sigma.
\end{align*}
[/step]
custom_env
admin
[step:Place $X_H(x)$ in the characteristic kernel]
Let $w\in T_x\Sigma$. From $T_x\Sigma=\ker dH_x$, we have
\begin{align*}
dH_x(w)=0.
\end{align*}
Using again the defining identity $\omega(X_H,\cdot)=dH$, evaluated at $x$ and applied to $w$, we get
\begin{align*}
\omega_x(X_H(x),w)=dH_x(w)=0.
\end{align*}
Since $w\in T_x\Sigma$ was arbitrary and $X_H(x)\in T_x\Sigma$, this proves
\begin{align*}
X_H(x)\in\ker\left(\omega_x|_{T_x\Sigma}\right)=\mathcal L_{\Sigma,x}.
\end{align*}
[/step]
custom_env
admin
[step:Use regularity and symplectic nondegeneracy to prove nonvanishing]
We claim that $X_H(x)\ne 0$. Suppose instead that $X_H(x)=0$. Then for every $v\in T_xM$,
\begin{align*}
dH_x(v)=\omega_x(X_H(x),v)=\omega_x(0,v)=0.
\end{align*}
Thus $dH_x=0$, contradicting that $c$ is a regular value of $H$. Therefore
\begin{align*}
X_H(x)\ne 0.
\end{align*}
[/step]
custom_env
admin
[step:Conclude that the nonzero Hamiltonian vector spans the characteristic line]
Since $c$ is a regular value of $H$, the regular level set theorem gives that $\Sigma$ is a smooth hypersurface in the symplectic manifold $(M^{2n},\omega)$. Therefore the hypotheses of [citetheorem:10060] are satisfied, and the kernel
\begin{align*}
\ker\left(\omega_x|_{T_x\Sigma}\right)
\end{align*}
is a one-dimensional subspace of $T_x\Sigma$. We have proved that $X_H(x)$ is a nonzero element of this kernel. A nonzero vector in a one-dimensional real vector space spans that vector space, so
\begin{align*}
\mathbb R X_H(x)=\ker\left(\omega_x|_{T_x\Sigma}\right)=\mathcal L_{\Sigma,x}.
\end{align*}
Since $x\in\Sigma$ was arbitrary, the conclusion holds for every $x\in\Sigma$.
[/step]