[guided]This is the crucial step — where the algebraic hypothesis earns its keep. We check that the endpoint of the lifted path does not depend on which path $\alpha_y$ we chose in $Y$ from $y_0$ to $y$.
**Setting up the comparison.** Let $\alpha_y$ and $\alpha'_y$ be two paths in $Y$ from $y_0$ to $y$. Let $\ell_1$ be the unique lift of $f \circ \alpha_y$ starting at $\tilde{x}_0$, and $\ell_2$ the unique lift of $f \circ \alpha'_y$ starting at $\tilde{x}_0$. We want to show $\ell_1(1) = \ell_2(1)$.
**Concatenate into a loop.** Form
\begin{align*}
\gamma := \alpha'_y \cdot \overline{\alpha_y}: I \to Y.
\end{align*}
Since $\alpha'_y(0) = y_0, \alpha'_y(1) = y = \overline{\alpha_y}(0), \overline{\alpha_y}(1) = y_0$, $\gamma$ is a loop at $y_0$, so $[\gamma] \in \pi_1(Y, y_0)$.
**Consume the hypothesis.** By assumption $f_*\pi_1(Y, y_0) \subseteq p_*\pi_1(\tilde{X}, \tilde{x}_0)$, so $f_*[\gamma] \in p_*\pi_1(\tilde{X}, \tilde{x}_0)$. By definition of $p_*$, there exists a loop $\tilde{\delta}$ in $\tilde{X}$ at $\tilde{x}_0$ with $[p \circ \tilde{\delta}] = [f \circ \gamma]$ in $\pi_1(X, x_0)$, i.e. $p \circ \tilde{\delta} \simeq f \circ \gamma$ rel endpoints.
**Lift the loop $f \circ \gamma$.** Let $\tilde{\gamma}^*$ be the unique lift of $f \circ \gamma$ starting at $\tilde{x}_0$. Apply [Lifted Path Homotopy](/theorems/1888) to the path-homotopy $p \circ \tilde{\delta} \simeq f \circ \gamma$: the lifts of homotopic paths rel endpoints, starting at the same point, are themselves homotopic rel endpoints — hence share their terminal point. The lift of $p \circ \tilde{\delta}$ starting at $\tilde{x}_0$ is $\tilde{\delta}$ itself (by [Uniqueness of Lifts](/theorems/1885)), and $\tilde{\delta}$ is a loop at $\tilde{x}_0$, so $\tilde{\delta}(1) = \tilde{x}_0$. Therefore $\tilde{\gamma}^*(1) = \tilde{x}_0$, i.e. $\tilde{\gamma}^*$ is also a loop at $\tilde{x}_0$.
**Decompose the lifted loop.** The loop $f \circ \gamma$ is the concatenation $(f \circ \alpha'_y) \cdot \overline{(f \circ \alpha_y)}$. Its lift starting at $\tilde{x}_0$ is obtained by concatenating
\begin{align*}
\tilde{\gamma}^* = \ell_2 \cdot \tilde{\mu},
\end{align*}
where $\ell_2$ is the lift of $f \circ \alpha'_y$ from $\tilde{x}_0$ (unique by [Path Lifting Lemma](/theorems/1886) and [Uniqueness of Lifts](/theorems/1885)), and $\tilde{\mu}$ is the unique lift of $\overline{f \circ \alpha_y}$ starting from $\ell_2(1)$.
**Identify $\tilde{\mu}$.** Reversing, $\overline{\tilde{\mu}}$ is a lift of $f \circ \alpha_y$ starting from $\tilde{\mu}(1)$ and ending at $\ell_2(1)$. Alternatively, $\overline{\tilde{\mu}}$ is a lift of $f \circ \alpha_y$ whose terminal point is $\ell_2(1)$.
**Force $\ell_1(1) = \ell_2(1)$.** We know $\tilde{\gamma}^*(1) = \tilde{x}_0$, and $\tilde{\gamma}^*(1) = \tilde{\mu}(1)$. So $\tilde{\mu}(1) = \tilde{x}_0$, i.e. $\overline{\tilde{\mu}}(0) = \tilde{x}_0$. Thus $\overline{\tilde{\mu}}$ is a lift of $f \circ \alpha_y$ starting at $\tilde{x}_0$. By uniqueness of lifts (the [Path Lifting Lemma](/theorems/1886) gives existence; [Uniqueness of Lifts](/theorems/1885) gives uniqueness), $\overline{\tilde{\mu}} = \ell_1$. Hence
\begin{align*}
\ell_1(1) = \overline{\tilde{\mu}}(1) = \tilde{\mu}(0) = \ell_2(1),
\end{align*}
as claimed.
This establishes that $\tilde{f}(y) := \widetilde{f \circ \alpha_y}(1)$ is a **well-defined** function of $y$, independent of the choice of $\alpha_y$. The hypothesis $f_*\pi_1(Y, y_0) \leq p_*\pi_1(\tilde{X}, \tilde{x}_0)$ was consumed exactly once, at the step where we used $f_*[\gamma] \in p_*\pi_1(\tilde{X}, \tilde{x}_0)$ to promote the projected loop to an element that lifts to a loop.[/guided]