[guided]The crux of the argument is a direct application of the previous theorem. The setup demands $V(F) \cap V(G) = \varnothing$ for the morphism to be globally defined; the previous theorem says this is impossible for $n \geq 2$ unless one of $F, G$ is a constant. So we are forced into the constant case.
\textbf{What goes wrong if $V(F) \cap V(G) \neq \varnothing$?} Geometrically, a common zero $p \in V(F) \cap V(G) \subset \mathbb{P}^n_k$ would have $\varphi(p) = [F(p) : G(p)] = [0 : 0]$, which is not a valid point of $\mathbb{P}^1_k$ — the homogeneous coordinates $(0, 0)$ are excluded from the equivalence-class definition of $\mathbb{P}^1_k$. So the formula breaks down at $p$, and the morphism is not defined globally — but $\varphi$ was assumed to be a morphism of projective varieties, hence defined everywhere. Contradiction.
\textbf{Why does the previous theorem need $n \geq 2$?} The argument in [Projective Hypersurfaces Always Intersect](/theorems/2157) uses Krull's Height Theorem to bound the height of any minimal prime over $(F, G) \subset k[X_0, \ldots, X_n]$ by $2$. The empty intersection scenario requires the radical of $(F, G)$ to be the irrelevant ideal $\mathfrak{m}_0 = (X_0, \ldots, X_n)$, of height $n+1$. The contradiction is $n + 1 \leq 2$, i.e. $n \leq 1$. In dimension $n = 1$, hypersurfaces can be disjoint — for example $V(X_0)$ and $V(X_1)$ in $\mathbb{P}^1_k$ are the two points $[0 : 1]$ and $[1 : 0]$, which are distinct.
\textbf{The case $n = 1$ is genuinely different.} For $\mathbb{P}^1_k \to \mathbb{P}^1_k$, non-constant morphisms exist in abundance — they are the rational maps $[X_0 : X_1] \mapsto [F(X_0, X_1) : G(X_0, X_1)]$ for any non-constant $F, G$ of equal degree with no common zero (in $\mathbb{P}^1_k$, "no common zero" is a meaningful condition because $V(F)$ is finite). These are the standard endomorphisms of $\mathbb{P}^1_k$, including the identity, the Frobenius, and so on. So the dimension condition $n \geq 2$ is genuinely used.
\textbf{Why does this fail in projective spaces with $n \geq 2$?} Because the source projective space is too "rigid" — it has too few global homogeneous polynomials to construct non-constant morphisms to lower-dimensional projective space. Geometrically, $\mathbb{P}^n_k$ for $n \geq 2$ admits no global rational function (no non-constant element of $k(\mathbb{P}^n_k)$ that is a morphism to $\mathbb{A}^1_k$), and the same rigidity prevents non-constant morphisms to $\mathbb{P}^1_k$ — any such morphism would have to "split" $\mathbb{P}^n_k$ along the levels of a ratio $F/G$, but no such global splitting is possible without a common zero of $F, G$.[/guided]