[step:Identify the weak gradient $\nabla f$ as the directional derivative for almost every direction]
Since $f$ is globally $L$-Lipschitz on $\mathbb{R}^n$, $f \in W^{1,\infty}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ with $\|\nabla f\|_{L^\infty} \le L$ — this is the standard characterisation Lipschitz Functions Coincide with $W^{1,\infty}$. Let $\nabla f \in L^\infty(\mathbb{R}^n; \mathbb{R}^n)$ denote the weak gradient.
Fix $v \in S^{n-1}$. We claim
\begin{align*}
D_v f(x) = \nabla f(x) \cdot v \quad \text{for $\mathcal{L}^n$-a.e. } x \in \mathbb{R}^n.
\end{align*}
Take any test function $\varphi \in C_c^\infty(\mathbb{R}^n)$. The difference quotient $(f(x + tv) - f(x))/t$ is bounded by $L$ everywhere (Lipschitz bound) and converges $\mathcal{L}^n$-a.e. to $D_v f(x)$ as $t \to 0$ by Step 2. The integrable majorant $L \cdot |\varphi(x)|$ allows the dominated convergence theorem:
\begin{align*}
\int_{\mathbb{R}^n} \frac{f(x + tv) - f(x)}{t}\, \varphi(x)\, d\mathcal{L}^n(x) \to \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} D_v f(x)\, \varphi(x)\, d\mathcal{L}^n(x) \quad \text{as } t \to 0.
\end{align*}
On the other hand, by translation-invariance of Lebesgue measure (substitute $x \mapsto x + tv$ in one of the two pieces),
\begin{align*}
\int_{\mathbb{R}^n} \frac{f(x + tv) - f(x)}{t}\, \varphi(x)\, d\mathcal{L}^n(x) = -\int_{\mathbb{R}^n} f(x)\, \frac{\varphi(x) - \varphi(x - tv)}{t}\, d\mathcal{L}^n(x).
\end{align*}
The difference quotient $(\varphi(x) - \varphi(x - tv))/t$ converges uniformly to $\nabla \varphi(x) \cdot v$ as $t \to 0$ (since $\varphi$ is smooth and compactly supported), and is bounded by $\|\nabla\varphi\|_{L^\infty}$ uniformly with support in a fixed compact $K$ for $|t| \le 1$. Hence by dominated convergence with majorant $\|\nabla\varphi\|_{L^\infty} \cdot \mathbf{1}_K(x) \cdot |f(x)| \in L^1(\mathbb{R}^n)$ (since $f$ is continuous and $K$ is compact),
\begin{align*}
\int_{\mathbb{R}^n} \frac{f(x + tv) - f(x)}{t}\, \varphi(x)\, d\mathcal{L}^n(x) \to -\int_{\mathbb{R}^n} f(x)\, \nabla \varphi(x) \cdot v\, d\mathcal{L}^n(x).
\end{align*}
By the definition of the weak gradient applied componentwise,
\begin{align*}
-\int_{\mathbb{R}^n} f\, \nabla\varphi \cdot v\, d\mathcal{L}^n = \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} (\nabla f \cdot v)\, \varphi\, d\mathcal{L}^n.
\end{align*}
Comparing the two limits,
\begin{align*}
\int_{\mathbb{R}^n} D_v f(x)\, \varphi(x)\, d\mathcal{L}^n(x) = \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} (\nabla f(x) \cdot v)\, \varphi(x)\, d\mathcal{L}^n(x) \qquad \forall \varphi \in C_c^\infty(\mathbb{R}^n).
\end{align*}
Both $D_v f$ and $\nabla f \cdot v$ lie in $L^\infty(\mathbb{R}^n) \subseteq L^1_{\mathrm{loc}}(\mathbb{R}^n)$, so the Fundamental Lemma of the Calculus of Variations yields
\begin{align*}
D_v f(x) = \nabla f(x) \cdot v \quad \text{for $\mathcal{L}^n$-a.e. } x \in \mathbb{R}^n.
\end{align*}
[/step]