[guided]We want to prove that $v(t) := \int_0^t T(t-s) f(s)\, d\mathcal{L}^1(s)$ is continuous in $t$. The naive temptation is to differentiate under the integral or "check the integrand is continuous in $t$" — but $t$ enters $v(t)$ in two different ways: through the upper limit of integration and through the integrand $T(t-s)$. We isolate these two effects with a **shift-plus-tail split**.
Fix $0 \le t < t+h \le T$ with $h > 0$. Write
\begin{align*}
v(t+h) - v(t) &= \int_0^{t+h} T(t+h-s) f(s)\, d\mathcal{L}^1(s) - \int_0^t T(t-s) f(s)\, d\mathcal{L}^1(s).
\end{align*}
Add and subtract $\int_0^t T(t+h-s) f(s)\, d\mathcal{L}^1(s)$ to separate the two effects:
\begin{align*}
v(t+h) - v(t) = I_1(h) + I_2(h),
\end{align*}
where
\begin{align*}
I_1(h) &:= \int_0^t \big[T(t+h-s) - T(t-s)\big] f(s)\, d\mathcal{L}^1(s), \\
I_2(h) &:= \int_t^{t+h} T(t+h-s) f(s)\, d\mathcal{L}^1(s).
\end{align*}
The piece $I_1(h)$ holds the integration interval $[0, t]$ fixed and only changes the integrand: this is the "shift" piece, controlled by **strong continuity of $T$** through dominated convergence. The piece $I_2(h)$ has the new integration interval $[t, t+h]$ that did not exist at time $t$: this is the "tail" piece, controlled by **absolute continuity of the Bochner integral**.
**Bounding the tail $I_2(h)$.** Using $\|T(\tau)\|_{\mathcal{L}(X)} \le M_T$ for $\tau \in [0, T]$,
\begin{align*}
\|I_2(h)\|_X \le \int_t^{t+h} \|T(t+h-s)\|_{\mathcal{L}(X)} \|f(s)\|_X\, d\mathcal{L}^1(s) \le M_T \int_t^{t+h} \|f(s)\|_X\, d\mathcal{L}^1(s).
\end{align*}
Since $\|f(\cdot)\|_X \in L^1(0, T)$, absolute continuity of the Lebesgue integral gives
\begin{align*}
\int_t^{t+h} \|f(s)\|_X\, d\mathcal{L}^1(s) \to 0 \quad \text{as } h \to 0^+.
\end{align*}
Why does absolute continuity hold? It is a property of every $L^1$ function: the integral over a set of Lebesgue measure $h$ tends to $0$ as $h \to 0$. Hence $\|I_2(h)\|_X \to 0$.
**Bounding the shift $I_1(h)$ via dominated convergence.** We apply the Dominated Convergence Theorem (Bochner version). We need (a) pointwise convergence of the integrand to $0$ in $X$ a.e. on $[0, t]$, and (b) a measurable real-valued majorant integrable on $[0, t]$.
For (a): fix $s \in [0, t]$. Then $t - s \ge 0$ and $t + h - s \to t - s$ as $h \to 0^+$. By strong continuity of $\{T(\tau)\}_{\tau \ge 0}$ at $\tau = t - s$,
\begin{align*}
T(t+h-s) f(s) - T(t-s) f(s) \to 0 \quad \text{in } X \text{ as } h \to 0^+.
\end{align*}
(At the boundary case $s = t$: $t + h - s = h \to 0^+$, and strong continuity of $T$ at $0$ gives $T(h) f(t) \to f(t) = T(0) f(t)$, so the difference still tends to $0$.)
For (b): for every $s \in [0, t]$ and $h$ small,
\begin{align*}
\|T(t+h-s) f(s) - T(t-s) f(s)\|_X \le \big(\|T(t+h-s)\|_{\mathcal{L}(X)} + \|T(t-s)\|_{\mathcal{L}(X)}\big) \|f(s)\|_X \le 2 M_T \|f(s)\|_X,
\end{align*}
and the function $s \mapsto 2 M_T \|f(s)\|_X$ is in $L^1(0, t)$ since $f \in L^1(0, T; X)$. The dominated convergence theorem applies and yields
\begin{align*}
I_1(h) = \int_0^t \big[T(t+h-s) - T(t-s)\big] f(s)\, d\mathcal{L}^1(s) \to 0 \quad \text{in } X \text{ as } h \to 0^+.
\end{align*}
**Combining.** Since $\|v(t+h) - v(t)\|_X \le \|I_1(h)\|_X + \|I_2(h)\|_X \to 0$ as $h \to 0^+$, the function $v$ is right-continuous at $t$.
**Left continuity.** For $h \to 0^-$, the same argument applies after swapping the roles of $t$ and $t+h$: write $v(t) - v(t+h)$ in place of $v(t+h) - v(t)$, with the new "tail" interval being $[t+h, t]$ of length $|h|$, and the same "shift" piece $I_1(h)$ on $[0, t+h]$. Both pieces vanish as $h \to 0^-$ by the same reasoning.
Hence $v: [0, T] \to X$ is continuous. Combined with $T(\cdot)g \in C([0, T]; X)$ (which is the strong continuity of the semigroup applied to the fixed vector $g$), we conclude $u = T(\cdot)g + v \in C([0, T]; X)$.[/guided]