[guided]We want to show that the form $\operatorname{Alt}(T)$ — which we built by averaging signed permutations of $T$ — is itself alternating. By definition, this means: for every $\tau \in S_k$ and every $(v_1,\dots,v_k) \in V^k$,
\begin{align*}
\operatorname{Alt}(T)(v_{\tau(1)},\dots,v_{\tau(k)}) = \operatorname{sgn}(\tau)\,\operatorname{Alt}(T)(v_1,\dots,v_k).
\end{align*}
The strategy is to write out the left-hand side from the definition, then perform a change of summation variable that converts the permuted arguments back into the standard form $(v_1,\dots,v_k)$, paying a factor of $\operatorname{sgn}(\tau)$ along the way.
Fix $\tau \in S_k$ and $(v_1,\dots,v_k) \in V^k$. By definition of $\operatorname{Alt}$ applied to the permuted tuple,
\begin{align*}
\operatorname{Alt}(T)(v_{\tau(1)},\dots,v_{\tau(k)})
&= \frac{1}{k!}\sum_{\sigma \in S_k} \operatorname{sgn}(\sigma)\, T(w_{\sigma(1)},\dots,w_{\sigma(k)}),
\end{align*}
where we have set $w_i := v_{\tau(i)}$ for clarity. Now $w_{\sigma(i)} = v_{\tau(\sigma(i))} = v_{(\tau\sigma)(i)}$, so the inner term is $T(v_{(\tau\sigma)(1)},\dots,v_{(\tau\sigma)(k)})$.
The natural change of variable is $\rho := \tau\sigma$. *Why is this a valid reindexing?* Because left multiplication by $\tau$ is a bijection $S_k \to S_k$ — its inverse is left multiplication by $\tau^{-1}$. So as $\sigma$ ranges over all of $S_k$, $\rho = \tau\sigma$ also ranges over all of $S_k$ exactly once.
Under this reindexing, $\sigma = \tau^{-1}\rho$, so we need to express $\operatorname{sgn}(\sigma)$ in terms of $\operatorname{sgn}(\rho)$. This is exactly what the [Sign Homomorphism](/theorems/778) provides: $\operatorname{sgn}: S_k \to \{\pm 1\}$ is a group homomorphism, so
\begin{align*}
\operatorname{sgn}(\sigma) = \operatorname{sgn}(\tau^{-1}\rho) = \operatorname{sgn}(\tau^{-1})\,\operatorname{sgn}(\rho).
\end{align*}
Furthermore $\operatorname{sgn}(\tau^{-1}) = \operatorname{sgn}(\tau)^{-1}$ (homomorphism), and since $\operatorname{sgn}(\tau) \in \{\pm 1\}$, its inverse equals itself: $\operatorname{sgn}(\tau^{-1}) = \operatorname{sgn}(\tau)$. Thus $\operatorname{sgn}(\sigma) = \operatorname{sgn}(\tau)\operatorname{sgn}(\rho)$.
Substituting,
\begin{align*}
\operatorname{Alt}(T)(v_{\tau(1)},\dots,v_{\tau(k)})
&= \frac{1}{k!}\sum_{\rho \in S_k} \operatorname{sgn}(\tau)\operatorname{sgn}(\rho)\, T(v_{\rho(1)},\dots,v_{\rho(k)}) \\
&= \operatorname{sgn}(\tau)\cdot \frac{1}{k!}\sum_{\rho \in S_k} \operatorname{sgn}(\rho)\, T(v_{\rho(1)},\dots,v_{\rho(k)}) \\
&= \operatorname{sgn}(\tau)\, \operatorname{Alt}(T)(v_1,\dots,v_k),
\end{align*}
where we pulled the constant $\operatorname{sgn}(\tau)$ out of the sum and recognised the remaining expression as the definition of $\operatorname{Alt}(T)(v_1,\dots,v_k)$.
Since $\tau$ and $(v_1,\dots,v_k)$ were arbitrary, $\operatorname{Alt}(T)$ satisfies the alternating transformation law, so $\operatorname{Alt}(T) \in \Lambda^k(V^*)$. This proves claim (1): $\operatorname{Alt}$ takes values in $\Lambda^k(V^*)$.[/guided]