[guided]We now collapse the computation. Applying linearity of $*$ to the three-term expansion of $u^\flat \wedge v^\flat$ and substituting the values from Step 1,
\begin{align*}
*(u^\flat \wedge v^\flat) &= (u_1 v_2 - u_2 v_1)\, e^3 + (u_1 v_3 - u_3 v_1)(-e^2) + (u_2 v_3 - u_3 v_2)\, e^1.
\end{align*}
Note carefully the sign on the middle term: $*(e^1 \wedge e^3) = -e^2$, not $+e^2$. This is the place where the cyclic structure $1 \to 2 \to 3 \to 1$ of the cross product gets encoded — when we re-order the basis $2$-vectors into the cyclic frame $\{e^2 \wedge e^3, e^3 \wedge e^1, e^1 \wedge e^2\}$, the coefficient $(u_1 v_3 - u_3 v_1)$ becomes $-(u_3 v_1 - u_1 v_3)$. After rearranging into the standard order $(e^1, e^2, e^3)$,
\begin{align*}
*(u^\flat \wedge v^\flat) = (u_2 v_3 - u_3 v_2)\, e^1 + (u_3 v_1 - u_1 v_3)\, e^2 + (u_1 v_2 - u_2 v_1)\, e^3.
\end{align*}
The classical cross product on $\mathbb{R}^3$ has the well-known componentwise formula
\begin{align*}
u \times v = \bigl(u_2 v_3 - u_3 v_2,\; u_3 v_1 - u_1 v_3,\; u_1 v_2 - u_2 v_1\bigr).
\end{align*}
Why does $\flat$ then convert this to exactly the right side? Because $\flat$ acts diagonally on coordinates with respect to the orthonormal basis: $u_i$ multiplying $e_i$ on the vector side becomes the same scalar $u_i$ multiplying $e^i$ on the covector side. So $(u \times v)^\flat$ has the same coefficients in $(e^1, e^2, e^3)$ as $u \times v$ has in $(e_1, e_2, e_3)$, namely $(u_2 v_3 - u_3 v_2, u_3 v_1 - u_1 v_3, u_1 v_2 - u_2 v_1)$.
These coefficients match those of $*(u^\flat \wedge v^\flat)$ exactly. Since both sides of the claimed identity are elements of $(\mathbb{R}^3)^*$ with identical expansions in the [dual basis](/theorems/414), they are equal. As $u, v \in \mathbb{R}^3$ were arbitrary, the identity $(u \times v)^\flat = *(u^\flat \wedge v^\flat)$ holds on all of $\mathbb{R}^3 \times \mathbb{R}^3$.[/guided]