[step:Show that the two constructions are inverse]First let $a \in F(A)$. By the definition of $\Psi_{A,F}(a)_A$ and by preservation of identities by $F$,
\begin{align*}
(\Phi_{A,F} \circ \Psi_{A,F})(a)
&= \Phi_{A,F}(\Psi_{A,F}(a)) \\
&= \Psi_{A,F}(a)_A(\operatorname{id}_A) \\
&= F(\operatorname{id}_A)(a) \\
&= \operatorname{id}_{F(A)}(a) \\
&= a.
\end{align*}
Thus $\Phi_{A,F} \circ \Psi_{A,F} = \operatorname{id}_{F(A)}$.
Conversely, let
\begin{align*}
\eta: \operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal{C}}(A,-) \to F
\end{align*}
be a natural transformation. We prove that $\Psi_{A,F}(\Phi_{A,F}(\eta)) = \eta$ componentwise. Let $X$ be an object of $\mathcal{C}$ and let $f \in \operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal{C}}(A,X)$. Naturality of $\eta$ with respect to the morphism $f: A \to X$ gives
\begin{align*}
F(f) \circ \eta_A
=
\eta_X \circ \operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal{C}}(A,f).
\end{align*}
Evaluating both sides at $\operatorname{id}_A \in \operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal{C}}(A,A)$ gives
\begin{align*}
F(f)(\eta_A(\operatorname{id}_A))
&= \eta_X(\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal{C}}(A,f)(\operatorname{id}_A)) \\
&= \eta_X(f \circ \operatorname{id}_A) \\
&= \eta_X(f).
\end{align*}
Using the definitions of $\Phi_{A,F}$ and $\Psi_{A,F}$, this says
\begin{align*}
\Psi_{A,F}(\Phi_{A,F}(\eta))_X(f)
&= F(f)(\eta_A(\operatorname{id}_A)) \\
&= \eta_X(f).
\end{align*}
Since $X$ and $f$ were arbitrary, $\Psi_{A,F}(\Phi_{A,F}(\eta)) = \eta$. Therefore $\Phi_{A,F}$ is a bijection with inverse $\Psi_{A,F}$.[/step]