[guided]Now suppose $x$ is not on the relative boundary, so $x \in \operatorname{relint}_A C$. We reduce this case to the boundary case by drawing a line through $x$.
Choose a non-zero vector $v$ in the direction space of $A$. Define
\begin{align*}
I := \{s \in \mathbb{R} : x+s v \in C\}.
\end{align*}
This is the slice of $C$ along the line $x+\mathbb{R}v$. Let $\gamma: \mathbb{R} \to A$ be the affine map $\gamma(s)=x+sv$. The set $I$ is non-empty because $0 \in I$. It is closed because $I=\gamma^{-1}(C)$, the map $\gamma$ is continuous, and $C$ is closed. To see boundedness, use compactness of $C$: there exists $R>0$ such that $C \subset B(0,R)$. If $s \in I$, then $x+sv \in C$, so $|x+sv|\leq R$. The triangle inequality gives
\begin{align*}
|s|\,|v|
=
|sv|
\leq
|x+sv|+|x|
\leq
R+|x|.
\end{align*}
Because $v\neq 0$, we obtain $|s|\leq (R+|x|)/|v|$. Thus $I$ is closed and bounded in $\mathbb{R}$, hence compact. It is convex because if $s_1,s_2 \in I$ and $t \in [0,1]$, then
\begin{align*}
x+\bigl((1-t)s_1+t s_2\bigr)v
=
(1-t)(x+s_1v)+t(x+s_2v)
\in C.
\end{align*}
Hence $I$ is a compact interval in $\mathbb{R}$.
Because $x$ is in the relative interior of $C$, there exists $\varepsilon>0$ such that
\begin{align*}
x+s v \in C \quad \text{for all } s \in (-\varepsilon,\varepsilon).
\end{align*}
Therefore $I$ contains an open interval around $0$. Since $I$ is compact and convex in $\mathbb{R}$, there are real numbers $\alpha<0<\beta$ such that
\begin{align*}
I=[\alpha,\beta].
\end{align*}
Define the two endpoint points of the slice by
\begin{align*}
y := x+\alpha v,
\qquad
z := x+\beta v.
\end{align*}
The endpoint property implies $y,z \in C$. Moreover, $y$ and $z$ lie on the relative boundary of $C$: if, for instance, $y$ were in the relative interior, then a small relative neighbourhood of $y$ in $A$ would be contained in $C$, and in particular $x+(\alpha-\delta)v \in C$ for some $\delta>0$, contradicting the minimality of $\alpha$. The argument for $z$ is identical, using $\beta+\delta$.
Solving for $x$ in terms of $y$ and $z$ gives
\begin{align*}
x
=
\frac{\beta}{\beta-\alpha}y
+
\frac{-\alpha}{\beta-\alpha}z.
\end{align*}
Since $\alpha<0<\beta$, both coefficients are non-negative and
\begin{align*}
\frac{\beta}{\beta-\alpha}+\frac{-\alpha}{\beta-\alpha}=1.
\end{align*}
Thus $x$ is a convex combination of the two boundary points $y$ and $z$. The previous step proved that both boundary points belong to $\operatorname{conv}(\operatorname{ext} C)$, and a convex hull is convex. Therefore
\begin{align*}
x \in \operatorname{conv}(\operatorname{ext} C).
\end{align*}[/guided]