[proof]
Continuity of $T|_{\mathcal{D}_K(\Omega)}$ at the origin means that $T^{-1}((-1,1))$ is an open neighbourhood of $0$ in $\mathcal{D}_K(\Omega)$. By the definition of the locally convex topology generated by $\{p_{K,N}\}$, every open neighbourhood of $0$ contains a basic neighbourhood of the form $\{\varphi : p_{K,N}(\varphi) < \varepsilon\}$ for some $N \in \mathbb{N}_0$ and $\varepsilon > 0$. So there exist $N_K \in \mathbb{N}_0$ and $\varepsilon > 0$ such that
\begin{align*}
p_{K,N_K}(\varphi) < \varepsilon \implies |T(\varphi)| < 1.
\end{align*}
Now let $\varphi \in \mathcal{D}_K(\Omega)$ be arbitrary with $p_{K,N_K}(\varphi) \neq 0$. Set $\psi := \varepsilon \varphi / (2 \, p_{K,N_K}(\varphi))$. Then $p_{K,N_K}(\psi) = \varepsilon/2 < \varepsilon$, so $|T(\psi)| < 1$. By linearity,
\begin{align*}
|T(\varphi)| &= \frac{2 \, p_{K,N_K}(\varphi)}{\varepsilon} \, |T(\psi)| < \frac{2}{\varepsilon} \, p_{K,N_K}(\varphi).
\end{align*}
Setting $C_K := 2/\varepsilon$ gives the result. The case $p_{K,N_K}(\varphi) = 0$ follows by a limiting argument: for any $\delta > 0$ and any $\psi_0$ with $p_{K,N_K}(\psi_0) < \varepsilon$, the function $\varphi + \delta \psi_0$ satisfies $p_{K,N_K}(\varphi + \delta \psi_0) = \delta \, p_{K,N_K}(\psi_0) < \delta\varepsilon$, so for $\delta$ small enough $|T(\varphi + \delta\psi_0)| < 1$; sending $\delta \to 0$ gives $|T(\varphi)| \leq 1$, and then the same rescaling gives $|T(\varphi)| = 0 \leq C_K \, p_{K,N_K}(\varphi)$.
[/proof]