[guided]The purpose of this step is to convert the geometric evolution equation into a scalar inequality for the size of the differential. Define $e:M\times[0,T_{\max})\to[0,\infty)$ by
\begin{align*}
e(x,t)=\frac{1}{2}|du(x,t)|_{g,h}^2.
\end{align*}
This scalar function records the pointwise energy density of the map $u(\cdot,t):M\to N$.
Let $\Delta_g:C^\infty(M)\to C^\infty(M)$ denote the Laplace-Beltrami operator associated to $g$. The [Bochner Formula for Harmonic Map Heat Flow](/theorems/bochner-formula-for-harmonic-map-heat-flow) applies because $u$ is a smooth solution of $\partial_tu=\tau_g(u)$ on $M\times(0,T_{\max})$. It gives
\begin{align*}
(\partial_t-\Delta_g)e=-|\nabla du|_{g,h}^2+\sum_{i=1}^{m} h\bigl(du(\operatorname{Ric}_g(e_i)),du(e_i)\bigr)+\sum_{i,j=1}^{m} h\bigl(R^N(du(e_i),du(e_j))du(e_i),du(e_j)\bigr),
\end{align*}
where $m=\dim M$, $(e_1,\dots,e_m)$ is a local $g$-orthonormal frame, $\nabla du$ is the covariant derivative of $du$ using the Levi-Civita connection on $M$ and the pullback connection on $u^*TN$, $\operatorname{Ric}_g$ is the Ricci endomorphism of $M$, and $R^N$ is the curvature tensor of $N$ in the sign convention used by the cited formula. The Ricci contribution is summed over $i$ only because $\operatorname{Ric}_g(e_i)$ already includes the contraction of the Ricci tensor into an endomorphism.
Now we use the curvature hypothesis. In this convention, for every $y\in N$ and every $\xi,\eta\in T_yN$ spanning a nonzero two-plane,
\begin{align*}
h(R^N(\xi,\eta)\xi,\eta)=K_N(\xi,\eta)\bigl(|\xi|_h^2|\eta|_h^2-h(\xi,\eta)^2\bigr).
\end{align*}
The factor $|\xi|_h^2|\eta|_h^2-h(\xi,\eta)^2$ is nonnegative by the [Cauchy-Schwarz inequality](/theorems/432) in $T_yN$. Since $K_N\leq 0$, this gives
\begin{align*}
h(R^N(\xi,\eta)\xi,\eta)\leq 0.
\end{align*}
Taking $\xi=du(e_i)$ and $\eta=du(e_j)$ gives
\begin{align*}
h\bigl(R^N(du(e_i),du(e_j))du(e_i),du(e_j)\bigr)\leq 0.
\end{align*}
Thus the target-curvature part cannot create positive growth in the energy density:
\begin{align*}
\sum_{i,j=1}^{m} h\bigl(R^N(du(e_i),du(e_j))du(e_i),du(e_j)\bigr)\leq 0.
\end{align*}
It remains to control the Ricci term from the domain. Since $M$ is closed, it is compact and the [continuous function](/page/Continuous%20Function) $x\mapsto \|\operatorname{Ric}_g(x)\|_{\mathrm{op}}$ has a finite supremum. Define
\begin{align*}
C_M:=2\sup_{x\in M}\|\operatorname{Ric}_g(x)\|_{\mathrm{op}}.
\end{align*}
Fix a point $(x,t)\in M\times(0,T_{\max})$. We should not compare $du(\operatorname{Ric}_g(e_i))$ directly with $du(e_i)$ for an arbitrary frame, because $du$ is not an isometry or even injective in general. Instead, use the symmetry of the Ricci tensor. The endomorphism $\operatorname{Ric}_g(x):T_xM\to T_xM$ is self-adjoint with respect to $g_x$, so the finite-dimensional spectral theorem gives a $g_x$-orthonormal eigenbasis $(e_1,\dots,e_m)$ of $T_xM$. Let $\lambda_i\in\mathbb{R}$ be defined by $\operatorname{Ric}_g(e_i)=\lambda_i e_i$.
In this eigenbasis the Ricci term diagonalizes:
\begin{align*}
\sum_{i=1}^{m} h\bigl(du(\operatorname{Ric}_g(e_i)),du(e_i)\bigr)=\sum_{i=1}^{m}h\bigl(du(\lambda_i e_i),du(e_i)\bigr)=\sum_{i=1}^{m}\lambda_i |du(e_i)|_h^2.
\end{align*}
Since $|\lambda_i|\leq \|\operatorname{Ric}_g(x)\|_{\mathrm{op}}$ for each $i$, we obtain
\begin{align*}
\sum_{i=1}^{m} h\bigl(du(\operatorname{Ric}_g(e_i)),du(e_i)\bigr)
\leq \|\operatorname{Ric}_g(x)\|_{\mathrm{op}}\sum_{i=1}^{m}|du(e_i)|_h^2
\leq C_M e(x,t),
\end{align*}
because $e(x,t)=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^{m}|du(e_i)|_h^2$. This is exactly the estimate needed: the Ricci term can increase the energy density at most linearly in $e$, with coefficient depending only on the fixed source metric $g$. Combining the Bochner formula with the nonpositive target-curvature contribution and the Ricci estimate gives the scalar parabolic inequality
\begin{align*}
(\partial_t-\Delta_g)e\leq C_M e
\end{align*}
on $M\times(0,T_{\max})$.[/guided]