[step:Choose the curvature threshold and transfer the derivative estimates]The contradiction proves that there is a threshold
\begin{align*}
r=r(\varepsilon,A,k,T,g(0),v_0)>0
\end{align*}
such that every point with $R(x,t)\geq r^{-2}$ has the asserted canonical neighbourhood at scale $R(x,t)^{-1/2}$.
It remains to record the derivative bounds. By the compactness and derivative estimates for normalized ancient $\kappa$-solutions, for the fixed $\varepsilon$, $A$, $k$, and $\kappa$, there are constants $D_1=D_1(\varepsilon,A,k,\kappa)<\infty$ and $D_2=D_2(\varepsilon,A,k,\kappa)<\infty$ such that every normalized base point in every model appearing in the theorem satisfies
\begin{align*}
|\nabla R|\leq D_1
\end{align*}
and
\begin{align*}
|\partial_t R|\leq D_2.
\end{align*}
This covers all alternatives: the shrinking-cylinder necks and caps have these bounds by the explicit model estimates, compact positively curved components are included in the compact part of the ancient $\kappa$-solution moduli after normalization, and the ancient-solution alternative is controlled by the same compactness statement. Equivalently, if one of these normalized quantities were unbounded, Hamilton compactness for normalized ancient $\kappa$-solutions would produce a smooth pointed ancient $\kappa$-solution limit with finite derivatives at its base point, contradicting smooth convergence. The $(\varepsilon,A,k)$-canonical-neighbourhood definition uses pointed parabolic $C^k$ closeness on the standard neighbourhood of spatial size $A$ in each listed alternative. Since $k\geq10$, this definition includes enough control of the metric and its time derivatives to compare the first spatial derivative and first time derivative of scalar curvature at the base point. Let $E=E(\varepsilon,A,k)<\infty$ be the comparison factor from this parabolic $C^k$ closeness, chosen so that the approximating normalized neighbourhood satisfies the two derivative bounds with $D_1$ and $D_2$ multiplied by $E$. Set
\begin{align*}
C_0:=E\max\{D_1,D_2\}.
\end{align*}
Because $\kappa=\kappa(g(0),T,v_0)$ is the finite-time noncollapsing constant determined by the initial metric and the initial unit-ball volume lower bound, $C_0$ depends only on $(\varepsilon,A,k,T,g(0),v_0)$.
Under the parabolic rescaling $\widetilde g=R(x,t)g$ and $\widetilde s=R(x,t)(s-t)$, the scalar curvature satisfies $\widetilde R=R(x,t)^{-1}R$, while
\begin{align*}
|\widetilde\nabla \widetilde R|=R(x,t)^{-3/2}|\nabla R|
\end{align*}
and
\begin{align*}
|\partial_{\widetilde s}\widetilde R|=R(x,t)^{-2}|\partial_t R|.
\end{align*}
Thus, with
\begin{align*}
C=C(\varepsilon,A,k,T,g(0),v_0):=C_0<\infty,
\end{align*}
we obtain
\begin{align*}
|\nabla R|(x,t)\leq C R(x,t)^{3/2}
\end{align*}
and
\begin{align*}
|\partial_t R|(x,t)\leq C R(x,t)^2.
\end{align*}
This is the asserted scale-invariant derivative control and completes the proof.[/step]