[guided]Now we use the part of the hypothesis that is specific to free probability. For every $k$, all coordinates $a_{k,1},\dots,a_{k,d}$ lie in the same unital $*$-subalgebra
\begin{align*}
\mathcal A_k=\operatorname{alg}(1,a_{k,1},\dots,a_{k,d}).
\end{align*}
The free-cumulant characterization of free independence says that a free cumulant vanishes whenever its arguments come from more than one member of a freely independent family of subalgebras. Its hypotheses apply here because the subalgebras $(\mathcal A_k)_{k \ge 1}$ are freely independent. In the summand
\begin{align*}
\kappa_m(a_{k_1,i_1},\dots,a_{k_m,i_m}),
\end{align*}
the $r$-th argument lies in $\mathcal A_{k_r}$. If the labels $k_1,\dots,k_m$ are not all equal, then the cumulant is mixed across at least two freely independent subalgebras, so it is zero. Consequently the only surviving terms are the diagonal choices
\begin{align*}
k_1=\cdots=k_m=k.
\end{align*}
The expanded cumulant therefore reduces to
\begin{align*}
\kappa_m(S_{n,i_1},\dots,S_{n,i_m})
=
n^{-m/2}
\sum_{k=1}^{n}
\kappa_m(a_{k,i_1},\dots,a_{k,i_m}).
\end{align*}
The tuples are identically distributed, and free cumulants are polynomial functions of the joint moments through the moment-cumulant relations. Therefore the joint free cumulants of the tuple $a_k$ agree with those of $a_1$:
\begin{align*}
\kappa_m(a_{k,i_1},\dots,a_{k,i_m})
=
\kappa_m(a_{1,i_1},\dots,a_{1,i_m})
\end{align*}
for every $k$. The sum contains $n$ equal terms, giving
\begin{align*}
\kappa_m(S_{n,i_1},\dots,S_{n,i_m})
=
n^{1-m/2}\kappa_m(a_{1,i_1},\dots,a_{1,i_m}).
\end{align*}
This is the central scaling identity of the proof.[/guided]