[proofplan]
We prove the quotient isomorphism by writing down the map explicitly. Since $G$ is cyclic, the subgroup $\langle g^m \rangle$ is normal, so the quotient is defined. We then send the coset $g^a\langle g^m \rangle$ to the residue class of $a$ modulo $m$, check that this does not depend on the chosen exponent, and verify directly that the resulting map is a bijective homomorphism.
[/proofplan]
custom_env
admin
[step:Verify that the quotient by $\langle g^m \rangle$ is defined]
Let $H := \langle g^m \rangle$. By [citetheorem:8235] applied to the element $g^m \in G$, we have $H \le G$. Since $G$ is cyclic, [citetheorem:8243] implies that $G$ is abelian. Therefore every subgroup of $G$ is normal: for every $x \in G$ and every $h \in H$, commutativity gives $xhx^{-1}=hxx^{-1}=h \in H$. Hence $H \trianglelefteq G$, so the [quotient group](/theorems/790) $G/H$ is defined.
[/step]
custom_env
admin
[step:Define the coset map to $\mathbb{Z}/m\mathbb{Z}$]
Let $\pi_m: \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z}/m\mathbb{Z}$ denote the canonical residue map, so $\pi_m(a)=a+m\mathbb{Z}$. Define a map
\begin{align*}
\Phi: G/H &\to \mathbb{Z}/m\mathbb{Z}
\end{align*}
as follows: for a coset $xH \in G/H$, choose $a \in \mathbb{Z}$ with $x=g^a$, and set
\begin{align*}
\Phi(xH)=\pi_m(a).
\end{align*}
Such an integer $a$ exists because $G=\langle g \rangle$. The next step proves that the value of $\Phi(xH)$ is independent of all choices.
[/step]
custom_env
admin
[step:Show that the coset map is well-defined]Suppose $a,b \in \mathbb{Z}$ satisfy $g^aH=g^bH$. Then $g^{-b}g^a \in H$, so $g^{a-b} \in H$. Since $H=\langle g^m \rangle$, there exists $k \in \mathbb{Z}$ such that
\begin{align*}
g^{a-b}=(g^m)^k.
\end{align*}
Using the power law in the cyclic subgroup generated by $g$, this becomes
\begin{align*}
g^{a-b}=g^{mk}.
\end{align*}
Because $\operatorname{ord}(g)=\infty$, [citetheorem:8238] gives $a-b=mk$. Hence $m \mid (a-b)$, so $\pi_m(a)=\pi_m(b)$. Thus $\Phi$ is well-defined.[/step]
custom_env
admin
[guided]The possible ambiguity in the definition of $\Phi$ is that the same coset may have two different representatives, such as $g^aH$ and $g^bH$. We must prove that these representatives give the same residue class modulo $m$.
Assume $a,b \in \mathbb{Z}$ and
\begin{align*}
g^aH=g^bH.
\end{align*}
Equality of left cosets means that $g^a$ differs from $g^b$ by an element of $H$. Multiplying on the left by $g^{-b}$ gives
\begin{align*}
g^{-b}g^a \in H.
\end{align*}
Since powers of a fixed element multiply by adding exponents, this is
\begin{align*}
g^{a-b} \in H.
\end{align*}
Now $H$ was defined to be $\langle g^m \rangle$, so every element of $H$ has the form $(g^m)^k$ for some $k \in \mathbb{Z}$. Therefore there exists $k \in \mathbb{Z}$ such that
\begin{align*}
g^{a-b}=(g^m)^k.
\end{align*}
Again using the power law, $(g^m)^k=g^{mk}$, hence
\begin{align*}
g^{a-b}=g^{mk}.
\end{align*}
The hypothesis $\operatorname{ord}(g)=\infty$ is now essential. By [citetheorem:8238], equality of powers of $g$ in the infinite-order case forces equality of exponents. Thus
\begin{align*}
a-b=mk.
\end{align*}
This says exactly that $m \mid (a-b)$, or equivalently that $a$ and $b$ define the same residue class in $\mathbb{Z}/m\mathbb{Z}$. Hence
\begin{align*}
\pi_m(a)=\pi_m(b).
\end{align*}
So the rule $\Phi(g^aH)=\pi_m(a)$ is independent of the representative and is well-defined.[/guided]
custom_env
admin
[step:Check that the coset map is a homomorphism]
Let $a,b \in \mathbb{Z}$. In the quotient group $G/H$, the product of the cosets $g^aH$ and $g^bH$ is
\begin{align*}
(g^aH)(g^bH)=g^{a+b}H.
\end{align*}
Since $\mathbb{Z}/m\mathbb{Z}$ is written additively, we compute
\begin{align*}
\Phi((g^aH)(g^bH))=\Phi(g^{a+b}H)=\pi_m(a+b)=\pi_m(a)+\pi_m(b).
\end{align*}
By the definition of $\Phi$, this equals
\begin{align*}
\Phi(g^aH)+\Phi(g^bH).
\end{align*}
Therefore $\Phi$ is a [group homomorphism](/page/Group%20Homomorphism).
[/step]
custom_env
admin
[step:Prove surjectivity and injectivity]
To prove surjectivity, let $\bar r \in \mathbb{Z}/m\mathbb{Z}$. Choose $r \in \mathbb{Z}$ with $\bar r=\pi_m(r)$. Then $g^rH \in G/H$, and
\begin{align*}
\Phi(g^rH)=\pi_m(r)=\bar r.
\end{align*}
Thus $\Phi$ is surjective.
To prove injectivity, suppose $a,b \in \mathbb{Z}$ and
\begin{align*}
\Phi(g^aH)=\Phi(g^bH).
\end{align*}
Then $\pi_m(a)=\pi_m(b)$, so $m \mid (a-b)$. Choose $k \in \mathbb{Z}$ such that $a-b=mk$. Then
\begin{align*}
g^{a-b}=g^{mk}=(g^m)^k \in H.
\end{align*}
Hence $g^aH=g^bH$. Therefore $\Phi$ is injective.
[/step]
custom_env
admin
[step:Conclude the quotient is cyclic of order $m$]
The map
\begin{align*}
\Phi: G/H &\to \mathbb{Z}/m\mathbb{Z}
\end{align*}
is a well-defined bijective group homomorphism, and therefore it is a group isomorphism. Since $H=\langle g^m \rangle$, this gives
\begin{align*}
G/\langle g^m \rangle \cong \mathbb{Z}/m\mathbb{Z}.
\end{align*}
This proves the theorem.
[/step]