[guided]Fix an element $\alpha \in L$. The point of looking at one element is that field equality can be tested elementwise: if every $\alpha \in L$ lies in $k$, then $L \subset k$.
Because $L/k$ is finite, every element of $L$ is algebraic over $k$. Thus $\alpha$ has a monic minimal polynomial over $k$, which we denote by $m_{\alpha,k} \in k[x]$. By definition, $m_{\alpha,k}$ is the unique monic polynomial of least positive degree in $k[x]$ satisfying
\begin{align*}
m_{\alpha,k}(\alpha)=0.
\end{align*}
It is irreducible in $k[x]$; otherwise a proper nonconstant factor vanishing at $\alpha$ would contradict minimality.
The polynomial $m_{\alpha,k}$ is nonconstant. Indeed, a constant nonzero polynomial cannot vanish at $\alpha$, while the zero polynomial is not allowed as a minimal polynomial. Since $k$ is algebraically closed, every nonconstant polynomial in $k[x]$ has a root in $k$. Applying this to $m_{\alpha,k}$, choose $a \in k$ such that
\begin{align*}
m_{\alpha,k}(a)=0.
\end{align*}
By the [factor theorem](/theorems/3235) in $k[x]$, the equality $m_{\alpha,k}(a)=0$ implies that $x-a$ divides $m_{\alpha,k}$. Now $m_{\alpha,k}$ is irreducible, and $x-a$ is a nonconstant divisor. Therefore the divisor cannot be proper: $x-a$ is an associate of $m_{\alpha,k}$. Since $m_{\alpha,k}$ was chosen monic, the unit factor is $1$, so
\begin{align*}
m_{\alpha,k}=x-a.
\end{align*}
Finally, evaluating the identity $m_{\alpha,k}(\alpha)=0$ gives
\begin{align*}
\alpha-a=0.
\end{align*}
Thus $\alpha=a$, and since $a \in k$, we conclude $\alpha \in k$.[/guided]