[guided]Assume the theorem is known for any list of $k-1$ pairwise distinct eigenvalues and corresponding nonzero eigenvectors, with $k \geq 2$. We must show that every linear relation among $v_1,\ldots,v_k$ has all coefficients equal to zero. So let $a_1,\ldots,a_k \in F$ be scalars such that
\begin{align*}
\sum_{i=1}^{k} a_i v_i = 0.
\end{align*}
The goal is to use the induction hypothesis, but that hypothesis only applies to the shorter list $v_1,\ldots,v_{k-1}$. We therefore need to manufacture a relation involving only those first $k-1$ vectors. The standard way to remove $v_k$ is to compare the original relation with the relation obtained after applying $T$.
Because $v_i \in E_{\lambda_i}(T)$, the definition of eigenspace gives
\begin{align*}
T(v_i)=\lambda_i v_i
\end{align*}
for every $i \in \{1,\ldots,k\}$. Applying the $F$-linear map $T:V \to V$ to the original relation gives
\begin{align*}
0 = T(0) = T\left(\sum_{i=1}^{k} a_i v_i\right) = \sum_{i=1}^{k} a_i T(v_i) = \sum_{i=1}^{k} a_i \lambda_i v_i.
\end{align*}
We also multiply the original relation by the scalar $\lambda_k$:
\begin{align*}
0 = \lambda_k \sum_{i=1}^{k} a_i v_i = \sum_{i=1}^{k} a_i \lambda_k v_i.
\end{align*}
Subtracting the second displayed equality from the first gives
\begin{align*}
\sum_{i=1}^{k} a_i(\lambda_i-\lambda_k)v_i = 0.
\end{align*}
This subtraction is designed so that the last coefficient becomes $a_k(\lambda_k-\lambda_k)=0$. Hence the relation reduces to
\begin{align*}
\sum_{i=1}^{k-1} a_i(\lambda_i-\lambda_k)v_i = 0.
\end{align*}
Now the induction hypothesis applies to the vectors $v_1,\ldots,v_{k-1}$: the eigenvalues $\lambda_1,\ldots,\lambda_{k-1}$ are still pairwise distinct, and each $v_i$ is nonzero and lies in $E_{\lambda_i}(T)$. Therefore $v_1,\ldots,v_{k-1}$ are linearly independent. By the definition of [linear independence](/page/Linear%20Independence), every coefficient in the displayed relation must be zero:
\begin{align*}
a_i(\lambda_i-\lambda_k)=0
\end{align*}
for every $i \in \{1,\ldots,k-1\}$. Since the eigenvalues are pairwise distinct, $\lambda_i \neq \lambda_k$ for each such $i$. Thus $\lambda_i-\lambda_k$ is a nonzero element of the field $F$, so it is invertible. Multiplying by its inverse gives $a_i=0$ for every $i \in \{1,\ldots,k-1\}$.[/guided]