[guided]The point of this step is to prove that the ambient product coordinates separate the directions tangent to $G$ from directions transverse to $G$. The theorem [citetheorem:8812] says that, after shrinking the transverse neighbourhood, no non-identity element of the subgroup $G$ can be written as $\exp(Y)$ with $Y\in\mathfrak h$. Its hypotheses are satisfied here: the ambient matrix Lie group is $GL(n,\mathbb C)$, the subgroup $G\le GL(n,\mathbb C)$ is closed by hypothesis, the infinitesimal subgroup is the Lie algebra $\mathfrak g$, and the chosen vector space $\mathfrak h$ satisfies $M(n,\mathbb C)=\mathfrak g\oplus\mathfrak h$. Therefore, after intersecting the neighbourhood supplied by [citetheorem:8812] with $W_0$ and then choosing a smaller open neighbourhood of $0$ if necessary, there is an open neighbourhood $W_1\subset W_0$ of $0$ in $\mathfrak h$ such that, with
\begin{align*}
\exp(W_1):=\{\exp Y:Y\in W_1\},
\end{align*}
one has
\begin{align*}
G\cap\exp(W_1)=\{I\}.
\end{align*}
We now shrink the ambient inverse-function-theorem chart so that only transverse vectors in $W_1$ occur. Since $U_0\times W_1$ is open in $\mathfrak g\oplus\mathfrak h$ and $F$ is a diffeomorphism on $U_0\times W_0$, replace $\Omega$ by the open neighbourhood $F(U_0\times W_1)$ of $I$. We prove
\begin{align*}
G\cap\Omega=F(U_0\times\{0\}).
\end{align*}
First, if $X\in U_0\subset\mathfrak g$, then the defining property of the Lie algebra gives $\exp(X)\in G$, so $F(X,0)=\exp(X)\in G\cap\Omega$. This proves $F(U_0\times\{0\})\subset G\cap\Omega$.
Conversely, take $Z\in G\cap\Omega$. Since $F:U_0\times W_1\to\Omega$ is a diffeomorphism, there are unique $X\in U_0$ and $Y\in W_1$ such that
\begin{align*}
Z=F(X,Y)=\exp(X)\exp(Y).
\end{align*}
Because $X\in\mathfrak g$, we have $\exp(X)\in G$ and hence $\exp(-X)\in G$. Since also $Z\in G$, closure of $G$ under multiplication gives
\begin{align*}
\exp(Y)=\exp(-X)Z\in G.
\end{align*}
But $Y\in W_1$, so $\exp(Y)\in\exp(W_1)$. Hence $\exp(Y)\in G\cap\exp(W_1)=\{I\}$, and therefore $\exp(Y)=I$. Finally, injectivity of $F$ on $U_0\times W_1$ gives $Y=0$ from $F(0,Y)=I=F(0,0)$. Thus $Z=F(X,0)$, proving the reverse inclusion and the slice identity.[/guided]