Androma

Attributions & Verification

Track contributions and verify theorem correctness

Back to Theorem

Proof

Step 1: The map $\iota$ is well-defined. Let $f \in W^{k,2}(\mathbb{R}^n) \subseteq L^2(\mathbb{R}^n)$. Since $L^2$ functions define tempered distributions via $T_f(\phi) = \int f\phi\, d\mathcal{L}^n$, we have $T_f \in \mathcal{S}'(\mathbb{R}^n)$. We must check that $T_f \in H^k(\mathbb{R}^n)$, i.e. that $(1 + |\xi|^2)^{k/2}\widehat{T_f}$ is represented by an $L^2$ function.

paragraph admin

By the Plancherel theorem, $\widehat{T_f} = T_{\hat{f}}$ where $\hat{f} \in L^2(\mathbb{R}^n)$ is the $L^2$ Fourier transform. Therefore $(1 + |\xi|^2)^{k/2}\widehat{T_f} = T_{(1+|\xi|^2)^{k/2}\hat{f}}$, and we need $(1 + |\xi|^2)^{k/2}\hat{f} \in L^2(\mathbb{R}^n)$.

paragraph admin

Step 2: Norm equivalence. The key identity is the comparison of polynomial weights. For any $\xi \in \mathbb{R}^n$:
\begin{align*} \sum_{|\alpha| \le k} |\xi^\alpha|^2 \le (1 + |\xi|^2)^k \le C_{n,k} \sum_{|\alpha| \le k} |\xi^\alpha|^2, \end{align*}
where the left inequality follows from the binomial expansion (each $|\xi^\alpha|^2$ with $|\alpha| \le k$ is a term in the expansion of $(1 + |\xi|^2)^k$), and the right inequality holds with a constant $C_{n,k}$ depending on the number of multi-indices.

paragraph admin

By Plancherel, $\|\partial^\alpha f\|_{L^2}^2 = \|\xi^\alpha \hat{f}\|_{L^2}^2$ for each multi-index $\alpha$. Therefore:
\begin{align*} \|f\|_{W^{k,2}}^2 = \sum_{|\alpha| \le k} \|\partial^\alpha f\|_{L^2}^2 = \sum_{|\alpha| \le k} \|\xi^\alpha \hat{f}\|_{L^2}^2 = \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} \sum_{|\alpha| \le k} |\xi^\alpha|^2 |\hat{f}(\xi)|^2\, d\mathcal{L}^n(\xi). \end{align*}
Combining with the polynomial comparison:
\begin{align*} \|f\|_{W^{k,2}}^2 \le \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} (1 + |\xi|^2)^k |\hat{f}(\xi)|^2\, d\mathcal{L}^n(\xi) = \|\iota(f)\|_{H^k}^2 \le C_{n,k}\,\|f\|_{W^{k,2}}^2. \end{align*}

paragraph admin

Step 3: Bijectivity. Injectivity: if $\iota(f) = T_f = 0$ in $\mathcal{S}'$, then $f = 0$ a.e. Surjectivity: if $u \in H^k(\mathbb{R}^n)$, then $\hat{u} = T_g$ for some $g \in L^1_{\mathrm{loc}}$ with $(1 + |\xi|^2)^{k/2}g \in L^2$. In particular $g \in L^2$, so $u = T_f$ where $f = \mathcal{F}^{-1}(g) \in L^2$. The norm equivalence from Step 2 then shows $\xi^\alpha g \in L^2$ for all $|\alpha| \le k$, giving $\partial^\alpha f \in L^2$ by Plancherel, hence $f \in W^{k,2}$.

paragraph admin

Step 4: The case $k = 0$. When $k = 0$, the weight is $(1 + |\xi|^2)^0 = 1$ and $\sum_{|\alpha| \le 0} |\xi^\alpha|^2 = 1$. Both sides of the comparison are identically $1$, so the norms are equal: $\|\iota(f)\|_{H^0} = \|\hat{f}\|_{L^2} = \|f\|_{L^2}$.

paragraph admin

Verification Status

Not Verified

Block Statistics

6 Total Blocks
0 Verified
0% verified

Contributors

admin 6 blocks (0 verified)

Who Can Verify

This theorem has no area tags. Only global reviewers can verify it.

Archie Pennycook Global Reviewer
Max Vassiliev Global Reviewer
Horia Neagu Global Reviewer
강현욱 Global Reviewer
Demo Testing Global Reviewer