[step:Use infinitesimal invariance to cancel the commutator term]
We claim that
\begin{align*}
Q([a,\Omega],\Omega,\dots,\Omega)=0.
\end{align*}
This is a pointwise identity of scalar $3+2(k-1)$ forms. To verify it, expand locally
\begin{align*}
a=\sum_{\alpha} \eta_{\alpha}Y_{\alpha}
\end{align*}
and
\begin{align*}
\Omega=\sum_{\beta}\omega_{\beta}X_{\beta},
\end{align*}
where each $Y_{\alpha},X_{\beta}\in\mathfrak g$, each $\eta_{\alpha}\in\Omega^1(U)$, and each $\omega_{\beta}\in\Omega^2(U)$. It is enough by multilinearity to check each coefficient expression.
The infinitesimal form of $\operatorname{Ad}$-invariance of $Q$ says that, for every $Y,Z_1,\dots,Z_k\in\mathfrak g$,
\begin{align*}
\sum_{j=1}^{k}Q(Z_1,\dots,[Y,Z_j],\dots,Z_k)=0.
\end{align*}
Apply this with $Z_1=\cdots=Z_k=X$. Since $Q$ is symmetric, every term in the sum is equal, and therefore
\begin{align*}
k\,Q([Y,X],X,\dots,X)=0.
\end{align*}
Because $k\geq 1$, this gives
\begin{align*}
Q([Y,X],X,\dots,X)=0.
\end{align*}
By polarising this identity, equivalently by applying the same infinitesimal invariance identity before setting the curvature arguments equal and using the even degree of the curvature forms to avoid sign changes, each coefficient in $Q([a,\Omega],\Omega,\dots,\Omega)$ vanishes. Hence
\begin{align*}
Q([a,\Omega],\Omega,\dots,\Omega)=0.
\end{align*}
[/step]